Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 15 (0.58 seconds)

Resham Singh vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 29 November, 2019

In view of the above, we find that the Division Bench judgments of this Court in Dhanwanti's case (supra); Santosh Raghuvanshi Vs. State of M.P. - 2013(II) MPWN 28 and Single Bench decision in Rajesh Barkade Vs. State of M.P. and others - 2018(2) MPLJ 148 are not the correct enunciation of law - as the time was fixed more to ensure that the proceedings are completed expeditiously rather than to confer advantage to the delinquent elected member. Consequently, the same are overruled."
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 6 - S A Bobde - Full Document

Ramji Singh Dangi vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 21 January, 2025

5. Government Advocate appearing for respondents/State submitted that show cause notices were issued to petitioner. Reply was received and proper opportunity to adduce evidence and cross-examination was provided to the petitioner. Statement of several witnesses were recorded in inquiry and same was produced before prescribed authority. Petitioner was found to be guilty for misappropriation of funds. A reasoned and speaking order has been passed by appellate authority. There is no illegality and impropriety in the order dated 15.07.2019. Statutory period of 90 days for passing order under Section 40 is directory and not mandatory as held in case of Rajesh Barkade vs State of M.P. and others, in W.P. No. 18135/2017 vide judgment dated 01.02.2018. Allegations made against Secretary and other persons cannot be considered as petitioner has not impleaded them as a party. No interference is called for in the impugned order and the petition be dismissed.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - V Dhagat - Full Document

Smt Meera Machar vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 29 October, 2018

Having regard to the judgment in the case of Dhanwanti Vs. State of M.P. and others reported in 2013(1) MPLJ 549 as also the order dated 1.2.2018 passed in WP No.18135/2017 in the case of Rajesh Barkade Vs. State of M.P. and others, it has been pointed out by counsel for the parties that the only issue remains about giving notice for extension of time to conclude the enquiry.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1   2 Next