Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.44 seconds)

Pramod Singh @ Pramod Kumar vs State Of U.P. & Another on 25 November, 2019

Considering the arguments of learned counsel for the parties and going through the record, it is evident that the marriage of the opposite party No.2 was solemnized with the applicant in the year 1994 and thereafter, she was ousted by the revisionist, then she filed an application under Section 125 Cr.P.C. which was registered as Misc. Case No.465 of 1998, (Smt. Suman Lata Vs. Pramod Singh) in the court below and the aforesaid case was decided vide judgment and order dated 16.04.1999 in which the maintenance of Rs.400/- was awarded to the opposite party No.2 for monthly basis. As the revisionist entered into the second marriage and at this stage, as per the price index, opposite party No.2 moved an application for enhancement of the maintenance and her application was allowed after giving opportunity to the revisionist and court below has observed that revisionist clearly deposed before the court below that he does not want to live with the opposite party No.2, as he is living with second wife.
Allahabad High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - R Singh - Full Document

Jay Prakash Gupta vs State Of U.P. And Another on 20 October, 2022

The present 482 Cr.P.C. petition has been filed to quash the impugned order dated 22.1.2016, NBW dated 30.11.2021 (contained in Annexure No.5 & 6 to the affidavit) as well as further proceeding of the Complaint Case No.865 of 2015, Prem Chandra versus Jay Prakash, under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act Police Station Kerakat, District Jaunpur pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court No. 14 Jaunpur.
Allahabad High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - K S Pawar - Full Document
1