Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 15 (0.48 seconds)
Documents citing Raj Kumar @ Mota @ Ganja @ Sonu @ Shankar & ... vs The State Of Haryana on 27 September, 2013

Paramjeet Kaur & Anr vs State Of Haryana & Ors on 20 July, 2022

99. Apparently, the learned Single Judge in the case of Sonu and others (supra) relied upon the interim orders of the Division Bench dated 20.04.2017 and 08.05.2017, which were clarified by the Division Bench as noticed above and directed that the joint merit list needs to be adhered to and the State was bound to implement it in letter and spirit. The said judgment is subject matter of appeal in the 5th bunch of cases. The decision, thus, on merits when the matter was still pending adjudication cannot be held to be justified as it is settled principle that the interim orders always merge in the final order and interim directions are only to make temporary arrangements to preserve the status-quo till the final hearing.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 64 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

Awadesh Jain vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 7 October, 2025

5. Counsel appearing for the petitioners has placed reliance upon the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Ramawatar Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2022) 13 SCC 635 as well as in the case of Sohan Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another, in criminal appeal no. 948 of 2024 decided on 26.11.2024 as well as in the case of Sonu and others vs. State of Haryana and others in CRM-M-30072-2019 decided on 31.10.2022 and it is argued that once the matter has been settled between the parties, it will be a futile exercise to continue with the criminal proceedings, therefore, prays for quashment of the entire proceedings initiated against the petitioners.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - V Mishra - Full Document

Rakesh vs State Of Haryana on 21 September, 2015

Learned counsel for the petitioner places reliance on the order dated 28.7.2015 passed by this Court in CRM-M-14341 of 2015 (Satbir alias Sonu Vs. State of Haryana), whereby co-accused of the petitioner was granted the concession of anticipatory bail. He further submits that story putforth by the prosecution seems to be a concocted one, because even number of the vehicle mentioned by the complainant was not factually correct, in spite of the fact that it was belonging to the complainant himself. He prays for allowing the present petition.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - R S Malik - Full Document

Sonu And Others vs Sudhir Rajpal, Ias And Another on 22 January, 2026

Learned counsel for the petitioner petitioners submits that contempt proceedings be initiated against the respondent for not complying the order dated 02.9.2025 (Annexure P-1)) passed by a co co-ordinate Bench of this Court in CWP-5680-2024 titled as ""Sonu and others vs. State of Haryana and others", others whereby the petition was allowed with the following observations :-
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 Next