Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 17 (0.50 seconds)
Documents citing Shailendra Kumar Verma vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 4 February, 2022

Omprakash Agrawal vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 18 August, 2025

Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he is the bonafide purchaser of the land in question. The initial Patta of the land in question is of the year 1972 and the first sale deed was executed in the year 1987. The petitioner claims that he is still in possession of the property in question. He has placed reliance upon the order dated 08.08.2025 passed by this Court in identical circumstances in the case of Shailesh Kumar Verma Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh and others (Writ Petition No.32008/2025) wherein this Court has granted interim relief to the petitioner therein. It is submitted that the name of the petitioner was recorded in the revenue records.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - V Mishra - Full Document

Radhe Radhe Stone L L P vs State Of Madhya Pradesh on 18 August, 2025

Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he is the bonafide purchaser of the land in question. The initial Patta of the land in question is of the year 1972 and the first sale deed was executed in the year 2011. The petitioner claims that he is still in possession of the property in question. He has placed reliance upon the order dated 08.08.2025 passed by this Court in identical circumstances in the cases of Shailesh Kumar Verma Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh and others (Writ Petition No.32008/2025) wherein this Court has granted interim relief to the petitioner therein. It is submitted that the name of the petitioner was recorded in the revenue record.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - V Mishra - Full Document

Pushpa Devi Agrawal vs State Of Madhya Pradesh on 18 August, 2025

Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he is the bonafide purchaser of the land in question. The initial Patta of the land in question is of the year 1972 and the first sale deed was executed in the year 1998. The petitioner claims that he is still in possession of the property in question. He has placed reliance upon the order dated 08.08.2025 passed by this Court in identical circumstances in the cases of Shailesh Kumar Verma Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh and others (Writ Petition No.32008/2025) wherein this Court has granted interim relief to the petitioner therein. It is submitted that the name of the petitioner was recorded in the revenue record.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - V Mishra - Full Document

Satish Kumar Nayak vs State Of Madhaya Pradesh on 18 August, 2025

Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he is the bonafide purchaser of the land in question. The initial Patta of the land in question is of the year 1971 and first sale deed was executed in the year 1986. The petitioner claims that he is still in possession of the property in question. He has placed reliance upon the order dated 08.08.2025 passed by this Court in the cases of Shailesh Kumar Verma Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh and others (Writ Petition No.32008/2025) wherein in identical circumstances this Court has granted interim relief to the petitioner therein. It is submitted that the name of the petitioner was recorded in the revenue records.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - V Mishra - Full Document

Rahul Agrawal vs State Of Madhya Pradesh on 18 August, 2025

Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he is the bonafide purchaser of the land in question. The initial Patta of the land in question is of the year 1972 and the first sale deed was executed in the year 2000. The petitioner claims that he is still in possession of the property in question. He has placed reliance upon the order dated 08.08.2025 passed by this Court in identical circumstances in the cases of Shailesh Kumar Verma Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh and others (Writ Petition No.32008/2025) wherein this Court has granted interim relief to the petitioner therein. It is submitted that the name of the petitioner was recorded in the revenue record.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - V Mishra - Full Document
1   2 Next