Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.59 seconds)

Vinod Aggarwal vs . Jai Kumar Gupta on 26 September, 2018

A5. Further, accused has nowhere disputed the factum that the address on which the legal notice was sent, is not correct address of the accused. Rather in the plea recorded u/s 313 Cr. PC r/w 281 Cr.PC, accused Vinod Aggarwal Vs. Jai Kumar Gupta CC No. 476607/16 Page 7 of 13 8 stated that he had not received the legal notice as he is shifted to somewhere else. This corobrated the plea of complainant that this was the last known address of the accused. Thus, in view of the above discussion, this court holds that the legal notice dated 12.11.2016 Ex.CW1/C was served on the accused.
Delhi District Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. Vinod Singh vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of ... on 21 March, 2023

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the view that no fruitful purpose will be served in keeping this petition pending. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2-Tehsildar, Tehsil-Kunda, Disrict-Pratapgarh to consider and decide the pending proceedings of Case No.8804 of 2021, Computerized Case No.T-202102570108804 (Vinod Singh vs. Shiv Shankar), most expeditiously after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties to the litigation and without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either party preferably within a period of three months from the date a certified copy of this order is placed before the Authority concerned, if possible and if there is no other legal impediment in this regard.
Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - S Lavania - Full Document

Devendra Kumar @ Mama Chaudhry vs State Of U.P.And Another on 16 April, 2026

2. The application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. Nos. 18452 of 2022 has been filed by accused Devendra Kumar @ Mama Chaudhry for quashing of entire proceedings arising out of Complaint Case No. 112/9 of 2022 (Vinod Kumar Vs. Devendra Kumar) under Section 138 of N.I.Act, Police Station Adarsh Mandi, Tehsil and District Shamli pending before learned Civil Judge (S.D.)/Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Shamli at Kairana as well as summoning order dated 30.03.2022 passed in the aforesaid case, whereas application under Section 18352 of 2022 has also been filed by accused Devendra Kumar @ Mama Chaudhry for quashing of the entire proceedings arising out Complaint Case No. 111/9 of 2022 (Pramod Kumar Vs. Devendra Kumar) under Section 138 of N.I.Act, Police Station Adarsh Mandi pending before learned Civil Judge (S.D.)/Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Shamli at Kairana as well as summoning order dated 30.03.20222 passed in the aforesaid case and that Criminal Misc.
Allahabad High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - G Chowdhary - Full Document
1   2 Next