Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 45 (0.78 seconds)
Documents citing Rina Rani And Ors vs State Of Haryana And Ors on 17 February, 2016

Tarsem Kumar vs State Of Haryana And Another on 3 December, 2018

Upon notice, reply on behalf of the respondents has been filed, wherein it has been stated that as per certificate dated 22.12.2017 (Annexure R-2), the petitioner had joined as Lab Technician on 01.04.2015 and continued his duty till 30.06.2015. After this, he did not join. With regard to the direction given in Rina Rani's case (supra), it is stated that the petitioner had never applied for re-employment after passing of the said judgment.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - R Bahri - Full Document

Akhleshwar Singh & Ors vs Union Of India & Ors on 18 February, 2016

Mr. Harish Rathee, Senior DAG, Haryana, on instructions from Mr. J.K. Sapra, Deputy Civil Surgeon, Faridabad and Mr. R.N. Sharma Deputy Civil Surgeon, Gurgaon states that petitioners case would also be covered as per the statement made by him on behalf of the State in JYOTI SHARMA 2016.02.25 17:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP No.23965 of 2015 -2- CWP No.20558 of 2015 titled as Rina Rani and others vs. State of Haryana and others, decided on 17.02.2016.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - D Sibal - Full Document

Sudesh Kumari vs State Of Haryana And Ors on 24 February, 2016

Mr. Harish Rathee, Senior DAG, Haryana, states that petitioner case would also be covered as per the statement made by him on behalf of the State in CWP No.20558 of 2015 titled as Rina Rani and others vs. State of Haryana and others, decided on 17.02.2016 and resultantly, the petitioner would be allowed to join as Multipurpose Health Worker (Female) on the post on which she was working prior to the termination on her services till 31.03.2016 i.e. the date till the scheme is in existence. It is further submitted that she would be paid salary from the date she joins till 31.03.2016.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - D Sibal - Full Document

Guddi Devi vs State Of Haryana And Ors on 24 February, 2016

Mr. Harish Rathee, Senior DAG, Haryana, states that the case of the petitioner would also be covered as per the statement made by him on behalf of the State in the case of CWP No.20558 of 2015 titled as Rina Rani and others vs. State of Haryana and others, decided on 17.02.2016. Resultantly, the petitioner would be allowed to join as Multipurpose Health Worker (Female) on the post on which she was working prior to the termination on her services till 31.03.2016 i.e. the date the scheme is in existence. It is further submitted that she would be paid salary from the date she joins till 31.03.2016.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - D Sibal - Full Document

Annu Rani And Ors vs State Of Haryana And Ors on 23 February, 2016

Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr. DAG, Haryana accepts notice and submits that in view of the statement made by him on behalf of the State in CWP No.20558 of 2015 titled as Rina Rani & others Vs. State of Haryana & others decided on 17.02.2016, the petitioners shall also be made to join on their respective posts and will be allowed to continue till the present scheme is in operation i.e upto 31.03.2016. It is further stated that after the date of their joining and till 31.03.2016 they shall also be paid their salaries.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - D Sibal - Full Document

Krishna Kumari & Anr vs State Of Haryana & Ors on 3 March, 2016

Mr. Harish Rathee, Senior DAG, Haryana, states that petitioners' case would also be covered as per the statement made by him on behalf of the State in CWP No.20558 of 2015 titled as Rina Rani and others vs. State of Haryana and others, decided on 17.02.2016 and resultantly, the petitioners would be allowed to join as Multipurpose Health Workers (Female), the post on which they were working prior to the termination of their services till 31.03.2016 i.e. the date till the scheme is in operation. It is further submitted that they would be paid salary from the date they joins till 31.03.2016.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - D Sibal - Full Document

Waseem Akram vs State Of Haryana And Ors on 3 March, 2016

Mr. Harish Rathee, Senior DAG, Haryana, states that petitioner's case would also be covered as per the statement made by him on behalf of the State in CWP No.20558 of 2015 titled as Rina Rani and others vs. State of Haryana and others, decided on 17.02.2016 and resultantly, the petitioner would be allowed to join as Lab Technician, the post on which he was working prior to the termination of his services till 31.03.2016 i.e. the date till the scheme is in operation. It is further submitted that he would be paid salary from the date he joins till 31.03.2016.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - D Sibal - Full Document

Neeraj Kumar & Ors vs State Of Haryana & Ors on 3 March, 2016

Mr. Harish Rathee, Senior DAG, Haryana, states that petitioners' case would also be covered as per the statement made by him on behalf of the State in CWP No.20558 of 2015 titled as ;Rina Rani and others vs. State of Haryana and others', decided on 17.02.2016 and resultantly, the petitioners would be allowed to continue as Sweeper-cum-Attendant, the post on which they are working till 31.03.2016 i.e. the date till the scheme is in operation. It is further submitted that they would be paid salary till 31.03.2016.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - D Sibal - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 Next