Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.25 seconds)

National Council For Teacher Education vs Maa Sharda Shikshan Evam Prashikshan ... on 17 October, 2019

27. Now, I proceed to examine as to whether the state has the power to restrict number of institutions coming up in the state and if yes, what is the stage. Learned AAG's stand that the state has the power to restrict the number of institutions was mainly based (Downloaded on 25/10/2021 at 09:33:36 PM) (16 of 21) [CW-2359/2021] on the judgment of Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of National Council for Teacher Education & Ors. Vs. Shri Shyam Shiksha Prashikshan Sansthan & Ors. (supra). But then, the applicability of the judgment is required to be examined in light of facts and statute involved therein.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 1 - Cited by 33 - Full Document

State Of Rajasthan vs Lbs B.Ed. College . on 8 September, 2016

(20 of 21) [CW-2359/2021] "9.20. Thus, from above, it is apparent that prior to the NCTE granting final recommendations, the State had a limited say to the extent of giving its opinion to the NCTE, otherwise, the role of the State Government is very formal one as held in State of Rajasthan Vs. L.B.S. B.Ed. College & Ors. (supra) and the State is not expected to obstruct commencement of the admission process once recommendation is granted and affiliation is found to be acceptable. However, it appears that the State authorities are not able to digest the verdict of the Supreme Court and are bent upon time and again initiating unnecessary and unwarranted litigation before this Court. The officers holding the helm of affairs of the State Government are expected to act with more caution and care. 9.21. In view thereof, the order impugned dated 04/12/2020 passed by the authorities based on the inspection conducted on the directions of the Principal Secretary, School Education dated 19/11/2020 is found to be illegal and the State could not have denied NOC/affiliation to the petitioners-institutions once they were duly recognized by the NCTE for running D.El.Ed. Course. The consequential action of not including the petitioners- institutions for counselling on the said basis and in treating the petitioners-institutions de- recognized is also held to be bad in law and in contravention with the provisions of the NCTE Act, 1993.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 23 - Cited by 120 - D Misra - Full Document

St. Johns Teachers Training Institute vs Regional Director, National Council ... on 7 February, 2003

31. A perusal of para No.16 of the judgment of Hon'ble the Supreme Court in case of St. Johns Teachers Training Institute (supra), relied by learned AAG shows that Hon'ble the Supreme Court has dealt with provisions of the erstwhile Regulations and guidelines dated 02.02.1996 issued by the NCTE regarding grant of NOC holding that the state government has power to restrict mushroom growth of the institutions. In this regard, it would be relevant to mention that the guidelines of NCTE dated 02.02.1996 in no ambiguous terms postulates that while granting the NOC, the state would take into account the requirement of establishing teacher training courses having regard to the number of the live register of the employment exchanges under all the institutions etc.
Supreme Court of India Cites 23 - Cited by 2323 - G P Mathur - Full Document
1