Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.24 seconds)
Prakash S/O Santosh Lande vs The Honble State Minister (Revenue), ... on 22 December, 2025 cites

Pradip Bhimrao Nichale And Another vs Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate ... on 28 August, 2018

26. In the circumstances, we are of the considered opinion that the Caste Scrutiny Committee without applying its mind, discarded the documents of pre-independance era, which are having more probative value. The reasons given are also not justified for discarding the documents when there are validity certificates of blood relatives placed on record. Furthermore, there is violation of the Rule 12(2) of the Rules. So also, the law laid down in the case of Apoorva Vinay Nichale (supra), is also not followed in the matter.
Bombay High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 237 - R K Deshpande - Full Document

Mah.Adiwasi Thakur Jamat Swarakshan ... vs The State Of Maharashtra on 24 March, 2023

18. It will be necessary to point out that Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Maharashtra Thakur Jamat Swarakshan Samiti (supra) has specifically held that in view of Rule 12(2) of the Maharashtra Scheduled Tribes (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of) Certificate Rules, 2003 (for short hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules'), if the Scrutiny Committee is not satisfied with the documentary evidence produced by the applicant, the application shall be forwarded to the Vigilance Cell for conducting the school, home and other enquiry.
Supreme Court of India Cites 20 - Cited by 89 - A Oka - Full Document
1