Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 31 (0.65 seconds)

Santosh Kumar Shukla vs The State Of Jharkhand on 4 February, 2021

29 W.P.(C)-7006/2013 Sanjay Kumar Singh Vs The State of Jharkhand L.P.A/695/2015 Sanjay Kumar Singh Vs The State of Jharkhand & Others 30 W.P.(C)-6994/2013 Kedarnath Singh Vs The State of Jharkhand & Others L.P.A/696/2015 Kedarnath Singh Vs The State of Jharkhand & Others 31 W.P.(C)-2572/2014 Sailesh Kumar Thakur and Others Vs The State of Jharkhand 32 W.P.(C)-3828/2014 Kuwar Ram Kashyap Vs The State of Jharkhand & Others 33 W.P.(C)-4222/2014 Umesh Nath Tiwary Vs The State of Jharkhand through Chief Secretary and Others 34 W.P.(C)-3123/2014 Sudhir Kumar Vs The State of Jharkhand 35 W.P.(C)-3651/2015 M/s India Estates Developments Limited through one of the Directors namely, Santosh Kumar Shukla Vs The State of Jharkhand through Chief Secretary and Others 36 W.P.(C)-2334/2015 Munshi Ram Kashyap Vs The State of Jharkhand through Chief Secretary and Others 37 W.P. (C) - 4895/2007 Smt. Kanak Kumari Devi and Anr.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 3 - D Roshan - Full Document

Shubhan Ansari vs The State Of Jharkhand And Ors on 11 September, 2017

Jharkhand High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 4 - R Shankar - Full Document

Barju Sah vs State Of Jharkhand on 13 August, 2015

Jharkhand High Court Cites 35 - Cited by 5 - V Singh - Full Document

Sudhir Kumar Mishra vs State Of Jharkhand & Ors on 31 July, 2015

29 W.P.(C)-7006/2013 Sanjay Kumar Singh Vs The State of Jharkhand L.P.A/695/2015 Sanjay Kumar Singh Vs The State of Jharkhand & Others 30 W.P.(C)-6994/2013 Kedarnath Singh Vs The State of Jharkhand & Others L.P.A/696/2015 Kedarnath Singh Vs The State of Jharkhand & Others 31 W.P.(C)-2572/2014 Sailesh Kumar Thakur and Others Vs The State of Jharkhand 32 W.P.(C)-3828/2014 Kuwar Ram Kashyap Vs The State of Jharkhand & Others 33 W.P.(C)-4222/2014 Umesh Nath Tiwary Vs The State of Jharkhand through Chief Secretary and Others 34 W.P.(C)-3123/2014 Sudhir Kumar Vs The State of Jharkhand 35 W.P.(C)-3651/2015 M/s India Estates Developments Limited through one of the Directors namely, Santosh Kumar Shukla Vs The State of Jharkhand through Chief Secretary and Others 36 W.P.(C)-2334/2015 Munshi Ram Kashyap Vs The State of Jharkhand through Chief Secretary and Others 37 W.P. (C) - 4895/2007 Smt. Kanak Kumari Devi and Anr.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 3 - P Patnaik - Full Document

Shanker Raju vs Union Of India on 4 January, 2011

In the view of the Shanker Raju (Supra) and Kunhayammed (Supra), it appears to this court that the orders passed by the Coordinate Bench, affirmed by the Division Bench of this Hon'ble Court and also affirmed by the Supreme Court of India, is binding upon the Circle Officer and the state authorities. It is also incumbent upon the State to adhere the same and under its Litigation Policy shall withdraw such order which has been passed by Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi without any basis, whereby Jamabandi has been shown to be suspicious pertaining to Khata no.-383, Mouza -
Supreme Court of India Cites 29 - Cited by 82 - H L Dattu - Full Document

Ganga Sugar Co.. Ltd., Etc vs State Of U.P. & Others Etc on 20 September, 1979

In Ganga Sugar Corpn. v. State of U.P. [(1980) 1 SCC 223 : 1980 SCC (Tax) 90] , at SCC p. 227, para 6 this Court cautioned that, the "judgments of this Court are decisional between litigants but declaratory for the nation". This Court further observed: (SCC p. 233, para 28) "28. ... Enlightened litigative policy in the country must accept as final the pronouncements of this Court ... unless the subject be of such fundamental importance to national life or the reasoning is so plainly erroneous in the light of later thought that it is wiser to be ultimately right rather than to be consistently wrong. Stare decisis is not a ritual of convenience but a rule with limited exceptions."
Supreme Court of India Cites 21 - Cited by 115 - V R Iyer - Full Document

Kunhayammed & Ors vs State Of Kerala & Anr on 19 July, 2000

In the view of the Shanker Raju (Supra) and Kunhayammed (Supra), it appears to this court that the orders passed by the Coordinate Bench, affirmed by the Division Bench of this Hon'ble Court and also affirmed by the Supreme Court of India, is binding upon the Circle Officer and the state authorities. It is also incumbent upon the State to adhere the same and under its Litigation Policy shall withdraw such order which has been passed by Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi without any basis, whereby Jamabandi has been shown to be suspicious pertaining to Khata no.-383, Mouza -
Supreme Court of India Cites 36 - Cited by 1157 - R C Lahoti - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next