violated, but also that,
even after the Contempt Case was filed on 29.06.2009,
construction of the building continued for nearly two years
thereafter till ... what
action the 2nd respondent took after the contempt case was filed on
29.06.2009 complaining of continued violation of the order of this
Court
Contempt of Courts Act,
1971, the Court which had initiated the contempt proceedings
cannot try him for the suo moto contempt proceedings rather
it should ... under Article 21 of the
Constitution of India.
C. This contempt proceedings can continue only after the
disposal of CM No. 17483/2013 which
seeking
amendment in the contempt petition and for addition and
implementation of the contemnors in the contempt petition.
The contempt petition has been filed ... contempt petition itself is barred by limitation under
Section 20 of the Contempts of Courts Act, 1971 ('the Act') as
the contempt petition
officers who were summoned, are present in
Court in person today.
Contempt Petition (C) No.382 of 2013 came to be filed
before this Court ... matter, we are satisfied that there is no
justification for continuing contempt proceedings or to revive
Contempt Petition (C) No.382 of 2013.
Despite
CONTEMPT PETITION (C) NO.488/2014 IN C.A. NO.3342/2014 &
CONTEMPT PETITION (C) NO.523/2014 IN C.A. NO.3342/2014 ... filed in the
meantime.
Interim order to continue.
CONTEMPT PETITION (C) NO.D.915/2015 IN C.A. NO.3342/2014
Permission to file contempt
reads as under :
"Limitation for action for contempt.- No court shall initiate any proceedings for contempt, either on its own motion or otherwise, after ... contemnor is within limitation of one year, taking into consideration continued act of contempt committed by contemnor, which commenced on 23.04.2011, repeated and recommenced
sworn to before this Court by the respondent, I have reopened the contempt petition.
9. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned ... respondent tendered unconditional apology, I consider it not necessary to continue this contempt proceedings against him.
K.K.SASIDHARAN, J.
(tar)
12. The respondent must
Committee,
Chennai-600 021 .. Respondent
Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondent for wilfully disobeying the orders ... main writ petition. Hence, I am not inclined to continue this contempt petition. This contempt petition is closed. The petitioner is at liberty to raise
said writ application.
The issue was continuance of O. P. No. 4 of the present
contempt proceeding as a Dean and HOD in Magadh
University ... hindrance. It is alleged in
the contempt application that O. P. No. 4 continued to
perform various kind of responsibilities and duties. Many
of which
complainant. In view of the same, we do not
propose to continue the contempt proceedings.
Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed with the
above observations
