appellants.
Mr. Vinay Garg, Advocate, with Mr. Rahul Consul, Advocate for the MDDA.
Mr. Pradeep Joshi, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand.
JUDGMENT
Coram ... appellants; Mr. Vinay Garg, Advocate
appearing on behalf of the MDDA; and Mr. Pradeep Joshi, learned
Standing Counsel appearing for the State.
4. Briefly
name of
"Panache Valley" from the Mussoorie Dehradun Development
Authority (MDDA), of which body the Vice Chairman and
Secretary, were respondents ... their
case that there is no provision under the building byelaws of
MDDA to seek 'NOC' from the Collector. The MDDA itself
sought
aside on a challenge
being given either by the authorities of the MDDA itself or
by any private individual. No proceedings as againt ... representatives of defendant No. 2, i.e. of MDDA in
the absence of the plaintiffs visited the property in dispute
and stopped the repair work
collusion of the State officers/officials
as well as the employees of MDDA. One glaring
example of encroachment on Chakrata Road is by
Mandir Samiti ... property was demolished. The Mandir Samiti was
allotted two shops at the MDDA Complex, however,
despite that, fresh encroachment has taken place in
triangular shape
Mdda Ramky Isbt Ltd vs Ombir Singh Tomar on 4 January, 2019
Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE 2019 SC 692
Author: R. Banumathi
Bench: Indira Banerjee ... 29876/2016
M/S MDDA RAMKY ISBT LTD.
THR. ITS DIRECTOR Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
OMBIR SINGH TOMAR Respondent(s)
O R D E R
BANUMATHI
Stamps & Registration
1
District Magistrate
13
Additional Secretary
10
Vice Chairman MDDA (Mussoorie Dehradun development Authority)
1
Chief Development Officer
4
Municipal Commissioner, Municipal
Lalit Samant, Advocate present for the respondents
no.4 & 5 - MDDA.
U. C. Dhyani, J. (Oral)
1. By means of present writ petition ... layout sanctioned from the
Mussoorie Dehradun Development Authority (hereinafter
referred to as MDDA). Subsequently, the petitioner got the name
of the firm changed from
that
Rs.17,89,512/- shall be deposited by the informant with MDDA,
Dehradun till 31.03.2016. The informant deposited Rs.10 lakh, but
subsequently ... consideration amount would be paid
by the informant with the MDDA Dehradun and in para no. 4 of the
agreement, it is also stated that
Ombir Singh vs Ms Mdda Ramky Isbt Ltd on 15 September, 2016
Author: Servesh Kumar Gupta
Bench: Servesh Kumar Gupta
IN THE HIGH COURT ... from Order No.466 of 2016
Ombir Singh
.... Appellant
Versus
M/s MDDA Ramky ISBT Ltd.
.... Respondent
Mr. Neeraj Garg, Advocate, for the appellant
Mussoorie
Dehradun Development Authority (from hereinafter referred to
as "MDDA") is the sole defendant. The relief sought is of
declaration ... declaring the order passed by the MDDA as
"null and void". The plaintiff/respondent no. 1 herein along
with the suit had also
