application was directed to be moved for seeking a
passover. Thereafter, at 11:15 am, the proxy counsel sought some
accommodation as the main counsel ... Trial Court
insisted upon an application being filed even for seeking a passover. The
main counsel was only 15 to 20 minutes late, and despite
Petitioner to
contact ld. counsel for the Respondent. After the Passover - Mr. Birender
Singh, Authorised Representative of the Respondent joined the proceedings.
Mr. Singh submits
clear from
the record. On the said date, in the morning, a passover was sought by the
Review Applicant itself and the matter was passed
been filed by the Defendants. In the interest of justice, a passover is
granted.
I.A.11639/2022 (for exemption)
2. Allowed, subject
also
enable junior counsels to ensure that they are not merely taking passovers
and adjournments but also get prepared in the matters and are ready
filed eight
months after the period of limitation had expired.
3. Passover is sought on behalf of the Defendant on the ground that the
main
This matter has been taken up twice. Even after granting a passover,
Mr. Suryavanshi, proxy counsel appearing for the Appellant, submits that
the main counsel
CORAM:
JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH
ORDER
% 22.02.2019
Counsel for the Petitioner seeks Passover, which is not possible today.
List on 22nd May, 2019.
PRATHIBA
this matter would show that even on 7th February,
2023, initially, a passover was sought and, thereafter, on second call time
was sought to file
disposed of."
7. Initially, when the mater came up for hearing, Passover was sought by
the ld. Counsel for the Plaintiff to seek instructions
