Tribunal and the
revenue authorities, have been suppressed by the
petitioner. As there is a suppression of material
facts, the petition deserves to be rejected ... Court. If the applicant makes a false
statement or suppresses material fact or attempts
to mislead the Court, the Court may dismiss the
action
plaint submitted that there
is no suppression much less material suppression.
The learned counsel for the plaintiff has relied
upon the judgment of the Apex ... suppressed were not crucial to
the case and on facts of that case. Therefore, it was
held that the suppression was not a material
suppression
Court. If the
applicant makes a false statement or
suppresses material fact or attempts to
mislead the Court, the Court may dismiss
the action ... 2015 suppressing the said facts and making
misleading statements, was nothing but
suppression of material facts at the instance of
the petitioners. The petitioners
6149/2014 CAV JUDGMENT
suppression of material facts by the petitioners. The
learned counsel for the respondents has given out that
all the petitioners filed ... candid manner and if they do
not do so and suppressed any material fact and
thereby obtained a Rule-nisi or notice or stay order
nature.
(5) He accommodated certain groups/borrowers by way of
suppressing material facts while preparing appraisal note and
recommending various credit facilities by violating Bank ... Bank.
(3) he accommodated certain groups/borrowers by way of suppressing
material facts while preparing appraisal note and recommending various
credit facilities by violating Bank
notice of Excise Department is foolproof, and there is
substantial material evidence of suppression of sales and the
said show cause notice also quantified ... relevant materials, was alongwith
report and show-cause notice placed at the disposal of the
Assessing Officer. These materials prima facie suggested
suppression of sale
have not come before the court with clean
hands and have suppressed material facts from the court so that they can
achieve the result
suppressed before this court, the petitioners are not entitled to
any of the reliefs as prayed for on the ground of suppression of
material facts ... acquired lands is incorrect and suffers
from the vice of suppression of material facts. Referring to the
record of the case, it was pointed
main ground for review is that the opponent No.1 suppressed
material fact that before this Court passed judgment dated
19.7.2013, his petition, being Special
highlighted the facts of the case to submit
that the petitioner suppressed material facts from
this Court, that he was well aware of the transaction