Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 33, Cited by 0]

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati

The Senior Superintendent Of Post ... vs Union Of India on 10 July, 2024

_ ee ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) ~
WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JULY,
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
'PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.NARENDAR
AND
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA

WRIT PETITION Nos. 10434, ag4d, 428, 5081, 8063, 5167, 5170, 6343,
8377, 5542, 5688, 8724, 8753, 6138, end, 8734, ne, 7448, 7449, 7486,
7927, 8888 & &597 OF 2024

Wo.No.10434 of 2034:

Beiween:
1. The Serior Superintendent of Post Offices, Prakasam Division, Ongole
~ $235 004.

The Pastmaster, Head Post Office, Ongole - 523 004

Bs

Feltioners
AND
1. The Union of india; Rep by iis Revenue Secretary, Ministry of Finance
Department of Expendifurs, Room No. 75, New Delhi - 770 0014.
2. The Commissioner of Central Tax, Guntur CGST Commissionerata,

Kannavarithola, Guntur - Se? on4.

w

The Ackifional Commissioner of Central Tax, Nellore Sub
Carmmissionerate, GST Bhavan, Annamayya Circle, Magunta Layout
Mini By-Pass Road Nellore ~ S24 003,

4. The Joint Director, DNrectorate General of GST Intelligence,
Visakhapainam Zonal Unit, Door No. 28-14-17, Surgya Bagh, Besides
Melody Theatre, Visakhapainam - 530 020.


The Superintendent of Central Tax, Ongole COST Range, Qngaie,

~
g
ex

Frakasam Disirkst - S23 O07
S. The Commissioner of Central Tax &Custoris (Appeals), Central

Revenue Building, D.No.3-30-18, sng! Road, Guriuy - 822 908,

wd

The Superintendent (Appeals), Office of fhe Comnussioner of Central
Excise (Appeals) Central Revenue Bullding, OD. No 3-30-15, Ring Road,

Guntu-S22006

Respondents

Petition under Aricie 228 of the Cansfiuficn of india praying that in the
croeumstances stated in the alfidavil Med therewith, the Hi igh Court may £
visased to issue a wri more particularly in the form of Writ of Mandamu
declaring the Order-Jn-OQriginal No. NCR-EAGCUO-ADC-O30-2020-21-
STax (Denove) dated 25.17. 2020 in confirming the demand of Rs $706, 600%
as Service Tax inclusive of Cesses vavable on the faxable services viz,
"Gourley Agency Service, Insurance Auxiliary Service and Business Auxiliary
Service" pravidad during the period from O7.04 2014 to Q0.00.2077 under

Section 7301} of the Finance Act, 1894 read with Section 174 of COST Act,

~
: ;
$3
oo
Ew
wt
ts
&

2O1F, @ demand of balance Service Tax amount of Rs.

Section 732} of the Finance Act, read with Section 174 af CGST Act, SOV?

and thereby imposing penalty of Rs.571,04,908% under Sub- Section (1) of

Section 78 of Fmance Act, 1944 read with Section 174 of CGST Act, S017,

nenalty of Rs. 10,000/- under Section 7Y(1 Ka) of the Finance Act, read with

Section 174 of COST Act, 017 for not taking reaisiration within the prescribed

wy
i

lime and a penally of Rs. 10,0004 under Section *7(2} af ihe Finance Act,
19B4 read with Secflon 174 of the COST Act, 2017 for non-filing of ST-3
returns os Hegel, arbitrary, high-handed and violative of orincinies of natural
justice and violative of Ariicie 14 of fhe Cansiitution of India and consequently
fo sel aside the Order-dIn-Orginal No. NLUS-EACUS-ADG-090-2020-2 1-

BOCs

Sax (Denove) dated 25.77 2020


IA NO: 1 OF 2624

Petition under Seclion 151 CPC fs filed praying that in the
crcumstances staled In the grounds filed in suppert of the petition, the High
Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the Order-in-Original No.
NLR- EXCUS-ADC-030-2020-21-STax (Denove) dated 25.11.2020 forthwith
io direct the Respondents to not take any coercive steps against the
Petitioners, Pending disposal of WP 10434 of 2024, on the fle of the High
Court,

The petifien coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the
affidavit fled in support thereof and the order of the High Court order dated
O3.05.2024 & 27.06.2004 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of
SRI DIVYA RAJU DATLA, Central Government Counsel for the Petitioners,
DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL for the Respondent No.1 and of Ms. Santhi
Chandra, Junior Standing Counsel for respondent Nos.2 to 7;

WP NO: 4844 OF 2024

Between:
1. The Superintendent of Post Offices, Guntur Didsion, Guntur - 522007.
2. The Postmaster, Head Post Office, Mangalagir- §22 002
. Petitioner
AND

}, Union of incia, Represented by iis Secretary, Ministry of Finance, North
Block, New Delhi, 110004.

é. The Principal Commissioner of Central Tax, Central Tax
Gormmissionerate, Guntur,

23

The Agsistant Commissioner of Central Tax and Central Excise,
Amaravall (ASST Divisional Office, Central Revenues Bullding, MG

Road, Viayawada.


4. The Superinensent of Central Tax, Amaravathi CGoT Range,
Viayawada.

>. Deputy Director, Diremtorate General of GOT intelligence,
Visakhapatnam Zonal Unit, OD. No 28-14-17, Surya Bagh, Besid

Melody Theatre, Visakhapatnam - 530020,

&. Superintendent of Central T x, ARC, Amaravathi CGST Division,-
Vilayawada.
Respondents

Petition under Article £26 of the Constiution of India is ed praying that
in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fied therewith, the High Court may
be pleased fo issue a writ more particularly in the form of Wirt of Mandamus
declaring the Order-in-Origmal No.4/20g2- 23-5.Tax dated TO06 2022 in

confirming the demand of Re 20, 19,a77/- as Service Tax inclusive of Cesses
payable on the faxable services viz, Courter Agency Service, Insurance

Auxiliary Service and Business Auxiliary Service provided during fhe period

from: O7.04 2014 30.06.2017 uncer Section 7S¢2}) of the Finance Act, 1993
read with Section 174 of COST Aci Sa¢7, a demand of balance Service Tax

amount of Rs.4.00,300/- under section 7a(2) of the Finance Act, read with
Section 174 of OGST Act, 2017 and thereby imposing penalty of
Rs.20,19, 877) under sub-section (1) of Sectian 7S of Finance Act, 1994 read
with Section 174 of CGST Act, 2017, penalty of Rs. 10,000 under Sect

??C) ¥a} of the Finance Act, read with Section 174 of CGST Act, 2017 far not
taking registrafion within the orescribed time and a penally of Rs. 10.000
under Section 77(2) of the Finance Act, 1994 read with Section 174 af the
COST Act, 2017 for non-filing af ST-S returns as Hiegal, arbitrary, high-handed

as to and violative of principles of natural justices and violative of Article 74 of
the Cansiltulion of india and consequently to set aside the Orderin- Griginal

No 4/2022-23-S. Tax dated 10.08. 2028.


LPs

IA NG. TOF 2024:

Feltion under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the
circumstanogs stated In the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High
Court may be pleased suspend the operation of the Orderin-Original
No.d/20228-23-S.Tax dated 10.08.2022 forthwith io direct the Respondents to
not take steps against the Petitioners, Pending disposal of WP 4844 of 2034.

an the Ne of the High Court,

The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the
affidavit fled In support thereof and the earlier order of the High Court dated
23.02.2024, 01,03. 2084, 18.19.2024, 26.04.9024 & 27.08.2024 made herein
and upon hearing the arguments of SRILG_ARUN SHOWR! KOENTRAL GOVT,
COUSEL) Advacate for the Petitioner and of SRI JUPUDI VK
YAGNADUTTICENTRAL GOVERNMENT COUNSEL) for the Re spordent
No.1, Ms. SANTHI CHANDRA, Standing Counsel for Respondent Nos. 2 fo 6:

WP NO: 4845 OF 2024:

Setveen:

weet,

. The Superintendent Of Past Offices, Guntur Division, Guntur - 582 Go?.

i

The Posimaster, Head Post Office,.Guntur-529 002.
Petvioners
AND
1. Union of india, Represented by its Secretary, Ministry of Finance, North
Block, New Defhi, 110001.
a. The Principal Gommissioner of Central Tax, Central Tax

Conmnissionerate, Guntur.

fae

The Additional Commissioner of Central Tax. Ofo. Commissioner of

Central Tax GST Bhavan, Kannavari Thota, Guntur - 522004.


on

4. The Assistant Camrrlssimner of Central Tax, Guntur CGST Division,

Guntur
&S. PAe Superintendent of Central Tax, Brociopet CQST Range, Guntur.

S$. Additional Director, Directorate General of GST intelligence,
Visakhagainam Zonal Unit, 2. No 28-14-17, Surya Bagh, Besides
Melody Theatre, Visakhapainam - 53002d.

Respondent/s

Patition under Article 286 of the Constitution of india is filed praying that
in the circumstances siated in [he affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may
be pleased fo issue @ wril more particularly in the form of Writ of Mandamus
declaring the Order-in-Original EXCUS- GUN-ST-OOC.ARC No 1/aoe2-
2025-8T dated 27.05.2022 in canfirming the demand of Rs. 1,34 58 8916 as
Service Tax inclusive of Cesses payable on the taxable services vis, Courier
Agency Service, insurance Auxiliary Service and Business Auxiliary Service
pravided during the period fram 01.04.2014 to 30.08.2017 under Section FS(2)
ai the Finance Act, 1993 and thereby imoosing penalty of Re. 134,88 8814
under sub-section 1} of Section 7S of Finance Act, 1994, penalty of Re.
10,000 under Section 77) Ma} of the Finance Act, for not taking registration
within the prescribed ime and a penalty of Rs. 10,0004. under Section P?i2)} of
the Finance Act, 1994 for nom-filing af ST-3 returns as illegal, arbitrary, high-
handed and violative of princinles of natural justice and violative of Article 14
of the Constitution of india and consequently to set aside the Order-in-Origin
LA CUSGUN-ST-QOO-ADC No.1 1/8082-2032-87T dated 27.05 2082 |

1A NOr TOF 2024:

Pelion under Section 7S) CPC is fied graying thal in the
clroumstances stated in the affidavit Sled in support of the petition, the High
Court may be pleased fo suspend the operation of the Crderin-Original
EACUS-GON-ST-OOD-ADC Nod 1/2088-8023-ST dated 27.05.2029 forthwith


3

fo direct the Respondents to nof take any coercive steps against the
Patitioners, Pending disposal of WP 4845 of 2024, on the file of the High
Caurt,

The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the
affidavit Hed in support thereof and the earlier order of the High Court dated
C2. i004 & 01.05. 2084, 16.03 2024, 26.04 2024 & 27.08.2024 made herein
and upon hearing the arguments of Sf.GARUN SHOWRICENTRAL GOVT.
COUSEL) Advocate fer the Petitioner and of Sri JUPUDD YOK
YAGNADUTTICENTRAL GOVERNMENT COUNSEL} for the Respandent
No.1, Ms. SANTHT CHANDRA, Standing Counsel for Respondent Nos. 2 fo &:

re

WP NO: 8061 OF 2024:

Between:
1, The Superintendent of Post Offices, Tenall Division, Tenall - 522201.
é. The Postmaster, Head Post Office. Bapatla- 522 101.
. Petitioners
AND

t. Union of India, Represented by its Secretary, Ministry of Finance, North
Block. New Delhi, 170004.

é. The Principal Commissioner of Central Tax, Central Tax
Coammissionerate, Gurtur.

The Assistant Commissioner of Cantral Tax and Centra! EXCISE,

Sod

Amaravall CGST Divisional Office, Central Revenues Building, MG
Road, Viayawada.
4. The Superintendent of Central Tax, Tenall CGST Range, Tenall,

x

Cepuly Director, ONrectorate General of GST Intell IGENnce,
Visakhapatnam Zonal Unit, O.No.28-14-17, Surya Ragh, Besides
Melody Theatre, Visakhanainam -530020

5. Superimiendent of Central Tax, ARC, Amaravathl CGST Division,

Vilayawada


Petition under Aricie 225 of the Constfution of {rdia is Hed graying thal
in the circumstances stated in the affidavil fled therewith, the High Court may

be pleased fo issue a writ more particularly in the form of Writ of Mandamus
declaring The Orderin-Original No.6/2022- 23-S Tax dated 12.08.2089 in

confuming the demand of Re.94.93, 749/in as Service Tay inclusive of Casses
payable on the faxable services viz, Courier Agency Service, Insurance
Auxiliary Service and Business Auxiliary Service provided during the period
from 07.04.2014 to 30.06.2017 under Section 72/2) of the Finance Act, 1983
read with Section 174 af COST Act 2017 and thereby imposing penalty of
RS.d4,83,742/- under sub-section (1) of Section 78 of Finance Act, 1994 re

with Section 174 of COST Act, 2017, penalty of Rs, 10,000 uncer Section
#?7() Ma) of the Finance Act, read with Section 174 of COST Act, 2037 for not
faking registrati ian within the prescribed time and a penally of Rs. 10.d0g/
under Section 772) of the Finance Act, 1994 read with Section 174 of the
GOST Act, 2017 for non-filing of ST-3 returns as flegal, arblirary, high-handed

and violative of principles of natural Justice and violative of Article 14 of the
Constitution of India and consequently te set aside the Order-in-Original

No. G/2032-23-5 Tay dated 12.08 2022.

IANO: 4 OF goed:

Pelion under Section 157 CPO is fled praying that in the
crcumstances stated in the affidavit fled in support of the petition, the High
Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the Orderin-Original
No. O/2022-23-8.Tax dated 13.08.2029 forthwith fo direct the Respondents fo
not take any coercive steps against the Petitioners, Pending disposal of WP
SUST af 2024, on the file of the High Court.

The peltion coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the

alidavit Wed in support thereof and the earlier order of the High Court dated


2? O2 2024, OT.03.2024, 18.038 2084, 26.04. 2024 & 27.06 2024 made herein
and upon hearing the arguments of Sri GARUN SHOWRICCENTRAL GOVT.
COUSEL) Advocate for the Petitioner, Sri JUPUIN VY K YAGHNA DUTT,
Deputy Solicitor General of india for Respondent No.1, Ms. SANTHI
CHANDRA, Standing Counsel for Respondent Nas. ¢ to &;

WP NO: S083 OF 2024:

Between:

1. The Superintendent of Post Offices, Narasaraopet Division,
Narasaraopet 522601.

2. The Postmaster, Head Fost Office, Sattenanalll- 522 403.

 Peltioners
AND |

1. Unian of India, Represented by its Secretary, Ministry of Finance, North
Biook, New Delhi, 170004.

é. The Principal Gommissioner of Central Tax, Central Tax
Gommissionerate, Guru,

3. The Assistant Commissioner of Central Tax, Certral GST Division,
Guntur, Pattabhipuram Main Road, Guntur,

4. The Superintendent of Central Tax, Narasaraopet | CGST Range,

Narasaracpel,

54

Deputy Director, Directorate General of GST intelligence,
Visakhapainam Zonal Unit, D.No.28-14-17, Surya Bagh, Besides
Melody Theatre, Visakhapatnam S30020.

iD

Superintendent of Central Tax, AR ©, Guntur CGST Division, Guntur.

Respondents

Petition under Aricie 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying thal

inthe ciroumsiances stated in the affidavit fled therewith, the High Court may


he pleased fo issue a wrif{ more particularly in the form of Writ of Mandamus

?

declaring the Order-in-Original No Sf2088-89-ST dated AG. OR 20e2 iA
confirming the dernand of Rs 36.48 S18) as Service Taw inclusive of Cesses
Gayable on the taxable services viz. Courier Agency Service, Insurance
Auxillary Service and Business Auxillary Service provided during the period
fram O7.04. 2014 to 30.06.2017 under Section FaC4) of the Finance Act, 1993
along with interest at apniinable rate under section 75 of the Finance Act,
Wed and a dernand of Rs.4O4/. under Section 7S of the Finance Act anc
thereby imposing penally of Re. 38.48 318/- under Section 78 of Finance Act.
1994, penalties under Section 77) and Section 7Y{2) of the Finance Act,
1984 as illegal, arbitrary, high-handed and violative of principles of natural
justice and violative of Article 14 of the Constitufien of India and consequently

yc yee MYO

et aside the Order-In-Original No. 5/2022-23-ST dated 30.08 2089.

year
Oo

iA NO: 7 OF 2024:

Fetiion under Section TS1 CPC is fled praying that in the
cumstances stafed in the affidavit Hed In supsart of the petition, the High
Gaurl may be pleased to suspend the operation of the Order-in-Ornigine!
No. 5/2022-23-ST dated 30.06.2029 forthwith fo direct the Respondents to not
take any steps against the Petitioners, Pending disposal af WP S063 of 2024,

on the fle of the High Court.

The petiion caming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the
affidavit Hed in support thereof and ihe earlier order of the High Court dated
27, 02.2024, O1. 03 2064, 18.03. 2024 26.04 2024 & 27.08 2024 made herain
and upon hearing the arguments of Sri GARUN SHOWR! {CEN TRAC GOVT,
COUSEL) Advocate for the Petitioner, Si JUPUDE Vo K YAGHNA GUTT,

Deputy Salictor General of india for Respondent No.1, Ms. SANTH!

CHANDRA, Standing Counsel for Respondent Nos. 2 fo &


WP NO: 5467 OF 2024:

Hefween:

q,

As,

C54

The Superintendent of Post Offices, Narasaraopet Division,
Narasaraapel - 522504,
The Postmaster, Nead Post Office, Narasaraopet- 622504
. Patiioners
AND
Union of india, Represented by iis Secretary, Ministry of Finance, North
Block, New Delhi, 176004.

. The Principal Commissioner of Central Tax, Central Tax

Commissionerate, Guntur
The Additional Commissioner of Central Tax, (ve. Commissioner of

Central Tax GST Bhavan, Kannavarl Thota, Guntur 522004.

. The Assistant Cormmissioner of Central Tax, Guntur CGST Division,

Guntur

. The Superintendent of Central Tax, Narasaraapet i COST Range,

Narasaraopet.
Additional Director, Directorate General of GST Intelligence,
Visakhapainam Zonal Unit, D.No.28-14-17, Surya Bagh, Besides
Melody Theatre, Visakhanainam - 8000.

. .&espondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is fled praying that

in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fled therewith, the High Court may

be pleased to issue a writ more particularly in the forrn of Writ of Mandamus
declaring the Order-in-Original EXCUS- GUN-ST-DO0-ADC No Ti/2022-
2023-87 dated 25.05. 2022in confirming the demand of Rs.84,98,981/. as

Service Tax inclusive of Cesses payable on the taxable services Wiz, Courler

Agency Service, Insurance Auxillary Service and Business Auxiliary Service

wre SoS

mravided during the period from 01.04.2014 to 30.06.2017 under Section Fae}


eu eye
PCS

~
Hy

foyey
Fost

and thereby

z

my

eas

awe
<P TL
Ayo fw

* Ar i

Of the Finance

en : Us CR 4 been as yee tenon
vers Ls rere 'a Sof! ait t be Atte, ;
ie & op amen 8 chem USS 2
"f, mo re aN ht L a ape oa
(oe RR a Ot ke
Ge Co nr ne epee
. a os a rs 7 ns ad
fe meg at ge A
a i @ ww we
oy, G2
penne ; ry : "5 ~ , Le > in) a ge st
ihe ogy seogee Thee ty prs
iy "6 € & mo SD
Soy 2 Me ben i ea oD
13 es 4 £, . aoe
% ¥ of3 Pael web Poe 3 4 a C3
a ae & a 68 oS fh
Pw ee oS "we f ageen ee
Lh ees $3 we te
fee a ne ne oe
aes a oe beee kage wtoen Co
Be @ E o Gq, +
GO F & RE 8 Me eB "ye
' wn 1 ; i. A ae
2 8 wm & BB oe
ae i me Fo ros tee & ae ae
yen pies C4 on fs 0% "seed oe ¢ *) rags
i Se ot fn
" porn, we Boee . me © cae ° oy. ix
(cee ES SS SE oS co a , ore
nen sae bd SS ca Us 4 Seve
° sonnet 44 pnt a lobe {
Seen fn a3 "of "oe oan oo w e
oy - be os,
com gy oO , ££ F&
2 es ny OS 2 0% oe ad
Bg 8 8 & O nd
6B Sn " Be m BB
Pes et thee bon ene 'y ae eo
Oo ¢ 3 Ce ted ee fs renin nos
o § 2 2 BB oF Neen
A th OR wenn CY
4p OG" ee im Ee
bh te 8 BH 2 GB we
we gee cB Te he.
bene Seow ae te 4 i Y
rn a rr rr ee, Pa @
on bord ~ eds vod
03 wt ay, hope mend een o ih
aces B gm C2 ey 6
oe eo 2 & x a Bd
i oa a a cre' ey
rn ie 12d tf
es .*
- &- & Y @

under

if "Gok Fn, og antes ' ,
wo 5  @ e i eG - w
me A ge re) Babes Ja
J8 : stan : oe
"me ge TSE i} 0 oe ae
oC Gg # @ & re om a fe
no if we os o« ch. ;
es

crcutistances stated in the affids

ot
bi
BO
the Order-in-Griginal
0

; yp £% ;

59 ety as hee
eo ay) , "s "4 om ete B a wot
Go pe tk ea "ff i
th. gee 4 week Tae. = oO KHER ne a:

NTRAL GO

x

oo

g

2

rcive steps against the

Respondent Niet,

for

aPIMQ, uu

Le

~
ric
ig

RRL
i

of

i
}

t

oy

y

The petifion coming on for he
O24, Of:

4
we

OLN,

afidayil fled In support therenf and |

GOUSEL) Advocate for the Petitk
Geputy Solicitor Geners

GHANDRAM, Standi:

28.02

<

on


WP NO: S470 OF 2024:

Between:
}. The Superintendent of Past Cifices, Tenall Division, Tenall - 52220

pe

The Postmaster, Neac Pos! Offies, Tenall- S22 204
 Pettianers
AND
}. Union of india, Represented by its Secretary, Ministry of Finanee, North
Block, New Delhi, 710001.

2. The Principal Commissioner of Cental Tax, Cental Tax
Camnussionerate, Guntur.
3. The Additional Cammissiaoner of Central Tax, Ofo. Commissioner of

Central Tax GST Bhavan, Kannavari Thota, Guntur §22004.

4. The Assistant Commissioner of Central Tax, Guntur CGST Divisio
Guntur,

5. The Superintendent of Central Tax, Tenali COST Range, Tenall.

4

ar

Additional Directar, Directorate General of GST Intelligence,
Visakhapasinam Zonal Unit, D.No.28-14-17, Surya Bagh, Besides
Melody Theatre, Visakhapatnam - 830020

. Respondents
Petition under Article 226 of fhe Constitution of india is filed praying that
in the ciroummstances stated In the affidavil filed therewith, the High Court may
he eased to issue a writ more particularly in the form of Writ of Mandarnus
declaring the Order-in-Original EACUS- GUN-ST-O00-ADC No. Tafed2e-
2023-57 dated 27.05.2022 in confirming the demand of Rs. 53,39,335/ as
Service Tax inclusive of Cesses payable on the faxable services viz, Courter
Agency Service, Insurance Auxiliary Service and Business AuxHlary Service
pravided during the perind from 04.04.2074 to 30.08.2017 under Section 73/2)
of fhe Finance Act, 19823 read with Sectlon 174 of COST Act, S017 and
thereby imposing penally of Rs. §3,99,338/- uncer sub-section (1) of Section
78 of Finance Act, 1994, penalty of Rs. 70,000 under Section 77{1 ia) of the



Finance Act, for not taking registration within the prescribed me and a
penalty of Rs. 10,000/. under Sertion ??7(2) of the Finance Act 1904 for nary
fing of ST-3 returms as Hlecal, arbitrary. fich-h 4 Aolative of
sts Ss ~ Ewa SASET YE tts TRAY SESS x aroHirary, HQ aide ay and YEO ARV ts
principles of natural justice and violative of Ariicie 14 of the Ganstifution of
india and consequently to set aside the Orderin. Original EXCUS~GUN-ST-

O00 - ADC No. 12/2022-2025-ST dated 27.05.9022.

IA NO: 7 OF 2024:

Fatiion under Section 151 CPC is Sled praying that in the
circumstances stafed in the affidavit fled in support of the petiion, the High
Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the Order-In-Origina
EACUS-GUN-ST-OOO-ADC No.1 2/2082-2023-ST dated 27.05.2022 farthwith
fo direct the Respondents io not teke any coercive sfens aqainst the
Petitioners, Pending disposal of WR S170 of 2024, on the file of the High
Court

The petition corning an for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the
afidavil Hed in support thereof and the sarfier carder of the High Court datec
26.02.2024, 01,03. 2024, 15.03.2024, 26.04 2084 & 37.06.2004 made herain
and upa hearing the arguments of Si G_ARUN SHO AVRICCENTRAL L GOVT,
COUSEL) Advocate for the Petitioner, Sr GUPUDIL VK YASHNA DUTT,
Depuly Solicitor General of inele for Respondent Noi, Ms. SANTHI!

CHANDRAM, Standing Counsel for Respondent Nas. 3 ta 8:

WE NO: 5343 OF 2024-

Between:
1. The Superintendent of Post Offices, Mr. M Srinivasu, Tadepalligudem
division, Tadepalligudem - 534401,
4. The Postmaster, Head Post Office, Tadepal liguden- 534104,


. Petitioners
AND
y. The Union of india, Rep. by its Revenue Secretary, Ministry of Finance,
Depariment of Expenditure, Roorn No. 7S, New Delhi- 110 004.
@. The Deputy Commissioner of Audit, Central Tax Guntur Circle, 3° Floor,
Annapurna Complex, Opp. Padmaja Petrol Bunk, Near APSRTC Bus
stand, Mangalagiri Road, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh ~ 522004 .
The Gomrissioner of Central Excise {Appeals}, Central Revenue
mulding, D.No.3-20-78, Ring Road, Guntur-Se2 008,
4. The Superintendent (Appeals}, Office of the Commissioner of Central

6a

Excise (Appeals), Central Revenue Building, D.No.3-30-15, Ring Road,
Guriur-5ee OOS.

. Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitulian of Inclia is filed praying that
nthe circumstances stated in the affidavit fled therewith, the High Court may |
be pleased to issue a writ more particularly in the form of Writ of Mandarnus
declaring ihe action of the Respondents, particularly, the Respondent No.2
Le, Depuly Commissioner of Audit, Central Tax, Guntur in confirming the
demand of Re.37,19.427/- ag service tax for the period from Apri-+ 2614 to
June-2017 along wih interest besides imposing a penalty of Rs.47,19,427/-
under section 78, penally of Rs. 10,000/- under section F?CiMA) and
Rs. 10,000/- under section 77(2) of the Finance Act, 1994 by way of Order in
Onginal No. O4/2022-23- S.Tax dated 34.05.2029 js illegal, without
jurisdiction, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice, without authority
of law, and violative of Article 14 anc Article 19(7Mg) of the Constitution of
dia.


iA NOG: 1 OF 2028:

Pettion under Section 181 of CPO is fled praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit fed in support of the petition, the High
Court miay be Pease fo suspend the operation of the Order in Original
No O4/2029-23-5 Tax og S7.03.2023 passed by Respondent No.2 wherein
ihe demand of Re 37 19 427% towards service tax was confirmed and a
penally of Re.37,19 427). was imposed under Section 78 of Finance Act, 1894

besides imposing further pe snalies of Re 1G,Q00/ each under Section FY{1NXa}
& 7F(2) of Finance Act 1994, Pending disposal of WP 5843 of 2024, on the He

ofthe High Court.

The Petition coming on for hearing, upen perusing the Pefitian and the

affidavil ied In support thereof and the earlier order of the High Court dated

a

me

OTOR 2084, 15.023 2024, 26.04. 2024 & 27.08 2028 made herein and uson
hearing the argumenis of SRI VENNA NEMANTH RUMARICENTRAL
GOVERNMENT COUNSEL) Advocate for the Petitioners, and of Deputy
Solicitor General of india, for the Respondent No.1, and of Ms. SANTH!

CHANDRA, Standing Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 to 4:

WP NO: S377 OF 2024:

Between:
}. The Superintendent of Post Offices, Mr. K.Adinarayana, Machilioainam
division, Machiloainam - 837 004.
<. The Postmaster, Head Fosf Office, Machiinatnar HO. 827 O04
. Petitioners
AND

{. The Union of india, Represented by Ys Revenue Secretary, Ministry of

Finance, Departrnent of Expenditure, Roam No. 78, New Delhi - 174004
dindia) .


%
oa

&. The Assistant Commissioner of Central Tax, COST Division, Autonagar,

Vilayawada-520 007

a3

. The Cormmmissigoner of Central Excise {Appeals}, Central Revenue
Building, D.No.3-30-15, Ring Road, Guntur-522 006

4. The Superintendent (Appeals), Office of ihe Carnmissioner of Central
Excise (Appeals), Central Revenue Building, D.No.3g-30-15, Ring Road,
Guniur-S2e O06

Respondents

Fettion under Article 226 of the Constitution of india is fled praying that
in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fled therewith, the High Court may
he pleased io issue a writ more particularly in the form of Writ of Mandamus
declaring the action of the Respondents, particularly, the Respondent No.2

& -

La. Assistant Commissioner of Certral Tax, COST Division, Vileyawada in
imposing @ Service Tax of Rs, 33,91,964/-, penalty of Rs.23,91,664/- under
section 78, penalty of Rs.10,000/- under section 7?P(1 HA}, and Rs. 10,000/-
under section 77(2) of the Finance Act, 1904 by way of Order in Original No.
S42022-20/ Asst CommyCGsTy AIST dated 27.10.2022 is egal, without
jurisdiction, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice, without authority
of jaw, and violative of Anicle 14 and Article 19(1\q) of the Constitution of

inecdisy

IA NO: 1 OF 2024:

Petition under Section 151 of CPC is fled praying thal in the
crcumsiances stated in the affidavit fled in support of the petition, the High
Gourt may be pleased to suspend the operation of the arders & consequent
recovery issued vide Respondent No.2 order no.33 i 20ee-2 sa? ASSEL
CGOSTYVJA JST, Dated. 27-10 2022 wherein Service Tax of Re.d3.91 o64/-, a
_penally of Rs.33,91,884/- was imposed under Section 78 of Finance Act, 1904

and ordered to be paid within thirty days.Further a penalty of Rs.20,000/. each


_
wn

sar ra ; FP FAL RY SB TIER Ae eye ¥ 4ONs 3 & interact af hrdting
under section 7 (ia) & FPS) of Finance Act 1994 in the inferest of justice

mending disposal of WP S37 of 2094. on the file of the High Court

o

The Petition carning on for hearing, Upon Serusimg the Petition and the

os

"

afidavid fed In sunport therenf anc the earlier order of the High Court dated.

OVO. 2024, 15.03.2024, 26.04.9084 & 27.08.2024 made herein and UO
nearing the arguments OF SR! VENNA HEMANTH KUMAR (CENTRAL
GOVERNMENT COUNSEL) Advocate for the Petitioners. and of Pepaty

Solicitor General of India. far the Respondent Noi, and of Mis Sant

bx

~

Ghandra, Standing Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 to 4:

WP NO: 5842 OF 2024:

Behvesi:
1. The Superintendent of Post Offices, Mr. Bunga Ambedkar alu, Shura

Civision, Eluru - Sa4aqoay.

cme

2. The Postmaster, Head Post Office, Eluru- S404.

. Patitioner

}. The Union of india, Represented oy iis Revenue Sec retary, Ministry of

Finance, Deparirrent of Expenciture, Room No. 76, New Delhi -
FTO0O4.
42. The Additional Commissioner, Office of the Cammissionsr of Central

Tax, G.S.T Bhavan, Kannavari Thofa, Guntur - 822004.

fxd

. The Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Central Revenue
Bullding, D.No.3-30-178, Ring Road, Guntur-S22 008.

4. The Superintendent AP peais}, Office of the Conynissioner of Central

oi

Guntur-S22 O08,

. Respondonis


Petition under Articie 226 of the Constitution of India is fled praying that
in the circurmstances stated in the affidavit Hed therewith, the High Courf may
be pleased to issue a writ more particularly in the form of Writ of Mandamus
declaring the action of the Respondents, sarticularly, the Respondent Nos
Le., The Additional Commissioner, Office of the Commissianer of Central Tax,
Guntur in confirming the derand of Rs.62.24.717/- as service tax for the
period from Apri-2O14 to June-2O17 along with interest besides inypasing a
penally of Rs.62.24,717/- under section 78, penalty of Rs.70,000/- under
section 77C NA) and Rs. 10,0004 under section 77(2) of the Finance Act,
1984 by way of Order in Original No. OG/2022-2023-ST dated 24.05 2022 is
legal, without jurisdiction, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice,
without authority of law, and violative of Article 14 and Article 19(1Kg) of the
Constitution of india:

18a NO: 1 OF 2064:

Fetiion under Section 151 CPC is Mec praying that in the
circumstances sigied in the affidavit fled in support of the writ petition, the
High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the Order In Original
na. UQ20e2-8023-ST daied 24.08.2022 passed by Respondent no.2 wherain
ihe demand of Re.b2.24.117/ towards service fax wag confirmed and a
penalty of Rs.62,.24.717/. was imposed under Section 78 of Finance Act, 1994
besides imposing further penaliies of Rs. 10,0004 each under Section 77
Na} & 77{2) of Finance Act 1994, pending disposal of WP.No.8542 of 2024, on

the He of the High Court.

The petition coming on for hearing, ugan gerusing the Petition and the
affidavit Hed in support thereof and the earlier order of the High Court dated
05.03.2024, 15.05.2024, 26.04.2024 & 27.06.2084 made herein and upon
hearing the arqumenis of Sri Venna Hemarth Kumar, (CENTRAL
GOVERNMENT CCUNSEL) Advocate for the Petitioners and Sr Jupucii


tees

'
>

. S888 QF 2Os4

WP NO

x
.

Between

Kar Raiu, Eluru

a Ambed

Es

Piss
HV

~
SR

Ag, £

wy

faq yh

3

7-8

&. The Postmaster, Head Po

. Petitioners

Finance, Denariment of

The Dep

Figg

"%

OY

, Annapurna Comp

°?
a.

glagh

sy
Re
<

Bus Stand, Man

The

Comm

oo

hed
ad,

eames

Bator

cxcise (Apneais), Central Revenu

fauniny-S22 O08

.. Respondents

Petition under A

es stated in

gf.
Ss

in the circumstanc

"
HN

Bt

aay

i

im af i

rm of WW

issue a writ more

be gleased f

declaring the action of t

fo tn,
& 10

2014

ore

ror A

°
¥
g

period

%
=

ice tax for the

y with int

onic

une-ZOT? al

x
z
wv


=)

urider section 7& penally of Rs. 10,000 under section 7 ftii
Rs. 10,000/- under section 77(2) of the Finance Act, 1994 by way of Order In
Onginal No, O1/2022-33- S.Tax dated 34.05.2025 Is egal, without
jurischotion, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice, without authority
of jaw, and violative of Article 14 and Article 19(7Nq) of the Constitution of

india,

IA NO: 7 OF 2024:

Petition under Section 151 CPC is fled praying that in the
circumstances stated In the affidavit fled In support of the writ petition, the
righ Gourl may be pleased to suspend the operation of the Order in Original
No.O7/2022-20-5. Tax dated 31.03.2023 passed by Responcdenine.2 wherein
the demand of Re. 38.28.7080). towards service tax was confirmed and a
penalty of Ra. 36,28,780/- was imposed under Section 78 of Finance Act,
1286 besides imposing further penalties of Rs. 10,000/ each under Section
Ff?) Ma) & 772) of Finance Act 1994, pending disposal of WP No S888 of
2024, on the fle of the High Court.

The petiion coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the
atidavit fled In support thereof and the earlier order of ihe High Court dated
O5.O6. 2024 12.03 2024, 28.04.2084 & 27.06.2024 made herein and upon
hearing the argumenis of Sri Venna Hemanth Kumar, (CENTRAL
GOVERNMENT COUNSEL) Advocate for the Petitioners and Sri Jupudi
ViRCYagnadutl, learned Central Government Standing Counsel for the
Mespondent No.1 and Ms Santhi Chandra, fearned Junior Standing Counsel
for ORIG for the Resnandent Nos.2 to 4:


°
a

S724 OF 2084:

.
<

We ANG
Behveen

edheed

fander

~
z

The Superin

BN
ar

ty

=
g

?

XK
without

t author

:
a

.  retitioners

. Respondents
soorden

Se

nk, Near APSRTC

ees

gr
e
iY

3

g
at

x, OS
i lustice, withor

22 OOF

Setral Bu
2

N

*
3

wy
as

Pats
er he
:

mM

Sacks
'al 7

~
Ne
:

g.

g

oy PN aide
foad, Guru

AOL

AN
me

Ms ~'.
NES

Yo
eh
wuents, particularly, the

C

Ho more pa

i,

Excise (Appeals), Central Reve

vit

ue aw
tion

gal

r, Head

1 ivferast

of

x

Nat

$
3

2 O08.

NINTUSS!

MS

mastic

&

>

nent of Expenielit

:

x
z

Cammissioner of
. under sea

?
H

rigor, Annapurna Compiles,

rhe Superintender

z

sus Stand, Man

Le

he Fast
section

aputy ©
Fs. 70,000

>

R

3
=

Depart
The Deputy
Sunture§

3

NS,

ra

~
Ree
~*~

June-2077 glong wi

demand of Rs. 26,08,

under
jurisdiction, arblrary, viniat


2

of law, and violative of Article I4 and Article 19(1g) of the Constitution of

india:

IA NG: 1 OF 2024:

Fetition under Section 151 CPC is fled praying inal in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit fled In support of the writ petition, the
High Court may be pleased fo suspend the operation of the Order In Original
No.02/2022-23-S.Tax dated 31.03.2023 passed by Respondent No.2 wheren
the demand of Rs 26.02, 204/ towards service fax was confirmed and 3
penalty of Rs.26,02,.304/- was imposed under Seciion 78 of Finance Act, 1294
besides imposing further penalties of Rs. 10,000/-each under Section 770
a} & 77(2) of Finance Act 1994, pending disposal of WP No S7e4 of 2044, on
the fie of the High Court.

The petiion coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petifion and the
affidavit fled in support thereof? and the earlier order of fhe High Court dated
08.038 2024, 15.03.2024, 26.04.2024 & 37.08.8024 made herein and upon
hearing the arguments of Sno Venna Hermanth Rumar, (GENTRAL
SOVERNMENT COUNSEL) Advocate for the Petitioners and Sri Jupudi
Vik Yagnadut, learned Central Government Standing Counsel for the
Respondent No.1 and Ms Santhi Chandra, learned Juniar Sfanding Counsel

for CRIC for the Resnondent Nos 2 to 4;

WP NO: 8783 OF 2024;

Between:
1. The Sr Superintendent of Past Offices, Mr M. Narasimha Swary,
Vilayawada Division, Viayawada - 520 001.
2. The Sr. Pasimaster, Head Rost Office, Viayawada HO- 520 007.
 ,. Pettioners


AND

y. The Urion of india, Rep. by fs Revenue Secretary, Ministn
Department of Expenditure, Roor: No 7S, New Deihi-t 10 d04
2. Commissioner of Central Tax, GST Shavan, Central Revenues Building,

KannavarThota, Guntur- S82 O04.
a. The Camrmissionar of Central Excise (Aopeats}, Central Revenue
Building, D.Na.S-30-15, Ring fond, GurturSe22 006

£3
s

4. The Superintendent (Appeals), Cifice of the Commissioner of Central
Excise (Appeals), Central Revenue Sullding, D.No.3-30-15, Ring Raad,
Suntur-Se2 O06

. Mespandents

Petition under Articie 226 of fhe Conatifution of india is fled praying that
in the circurnsiances stated In the affidaw! Med therewith, the High Court may

be pleased to issue a writ mars particularly in the forrn of Writ of Mandamus

-

e

declannig the action of the Respondents, particularly, the Respondent No.

Le... Gommnissinner Central Revenues "_ Kannavarithota. Guntur in
imiposiig @ wherein 4} Demand of Central Tax, GST Bhavan, Rs.2,7S, 14 47o/-
Wis 7X2) of Fin. Act, 1994, GD) Penalty of Rs 2.79.14 479). under Sec. 78 of
PinuAct, 1994 and GH) Penalty of Rs. 10,0004 u's FF{S) of Finance Act, 1404

and is also imposed by way of Order in Onginal No. W/ST/1S/So/2079-.Ad]

dated 37.09.2022 is Hegel, wihout junsdiction, arbitrary, violative of principles
of natural justice, without authority of law, and violative of Article 14 and Article

TST Ng) of the Constitution of India

iA NO? TOF Food:

Fettion under Secfian 3S) CPO i fied ens inat im the
circumstances staled in the affidavit fled in support of the wrt petitian, the
High Court may be pleased fo suspend the operation of the orders &

consequent fecovery issuecd vide Respoarmient Nog order no.



WISTHTS/59/2019-Adj dated 31.08.2022, wherein Service Tax of G) wherein ()
Demand of Rs.2.78.14.479). ws FS) of Fin. Act, 1984, GD) Penally of
Nis 2,79,14,479/- under Sec. 78 of Fin. Act, 1994 & () Penally of Rs. 70,000/
u/s T7(2) of Finance Act, 1994 in the interest of Justice, pencing disposal of

WP S783 of 2024, an the fle of the High Court.

The petition caming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the
affidavit fled in support thereof and the earlier arder of the High Court dated
O5.03. 2024, 15.05.2024, 26.04. 2024 & 27.06.2084 made herein and upon
hearing the arguments of Sri Venna Nemanth Kumar (CENTRAL
SOVERNMENT COUNSEL), Advocate for the Petitioners, and of Sri Jupuci
VK Yegnadutl, learned Central Government Standing Counsel for the
Respondent No.1 and Ms Santhi Chandra, learned Junior Standing Counsel

for CBE for the Respondeni Nos.¢ to 4

WP NO: 6138 OF 2024: "

Between:
1. The Senior Superintendent of Post Offices, Bhimavaram division,
mhimavaram - 534 201. |
2. The Postmaster, Head Past Office, Bhimavaram HO- 534 260.
Petitioners
AND
1. The Union of India, Represented by lis Secretary, Ministry of Finance,
Department of Expenditure, Room No. 75, New Delhi- 170 004,

ND

The Principal Commissioner of Central Tax, Central Tax
Commissionerate, Guntur

3, The Additional Commissioner of Central Tax, Ofo The Commissioner of
Central Tax, GST Bhawan, Kannavarithota Guntur-d22 004

4 The Commissioner of Central Tax (Appeals), Guntur CGST

Cammissionerate, Kannavarithota, Guntura22 004


o. The DenutyiAssistant Commissioner of Central Tax, Elury GST
Division, Ashok Nagar Eluru-534 a0¢.

5. The Superintendent of Central Tax, Bhimavaram

Shimavararmn-534 204

vod

Additional Ofrector, Directorate General of OST ifeligence,

Visakhapatnam Zonal Unit, D.No S8-14-15

and
¢
4%
eo
fae
rey
ae,
ry
bar
eS,
oy
e
ae
es
%
as
ox
cade
ce
Ty

Metody Theatre, Visakhapainam-S300s0

. Respondents

Patition under Article 286 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that
in the clrcumtances stated In the affidavit fled therewifh, the High Court may
be pleased {9 Issue a WHt more
declaring the Order in Original No. O64 ERXCUS-GUN-ST-000-ADC No.
TO/2022-2023- ST dated O3.08.2022 confirming the demand of Rs.

particulary in the form of Writ of Mandamus

54,95, 408/-ae service fax inclusive of Cesses payable on the taxable services
vig, Gourter Agency Service, Insurance Auxillary Service and Business

he

Auxiliary Service provided during the period from (4.04 2014 fo 30.08 2017
under Section 73¢2} of the Finance Aci, 1983 and thereby imposing a penalty
of Rs.04.9o 408/under sub-section(?) of Section 7S of Finance Act, 19594,
penally of Rs. 10,000 under Section 77(( a) of ihe Finance Act, for nat taking
regisiration within the prescribed time and a penalty of Rs. 10,0004 under
Section 77 (2) of the Finance Act, 1994 for non- fing of ST-3 returns is Negal,
wilhoul jurisdiction, arbiirary, violative of princigles of netural justice, without
aulhorily of law, and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and

consequently fo Sef aside the Orderin- Original No. O-4 EXCUS-<GUN-ST-
O00-ADC No. 1O/2022-2025-S7T dated 03.06.2028.

IANO: 7 OF 2024:

Petition under Section 751 CPC is fled praying thet in the
A

circumstances stated in the affidavit fled In support of the petition, the Hi

pot


Court may be pleased fo suspend the operation of the Order-in- Original No.
ceLO EXOUS-~GUN-ST-G00-ADC No. 16/2022-2083-ST dated 03.00. 202¢
forthwith to direct the Respondents to nat take any coercive steps against the

atitioners, pending disposal of WP S138 of 2024, on the file of the High

Court

The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the
affidavit fled in support thereof and the earlier arder of the High Court dated
11.03.2024, 15.03.2024, 26.04.2084 & 27 06.2024 made herein and upon
Nearing the arqurnents of SRUGARUN SHOWRI (CENTRAL GOVT.
COUNSEL) Counsel for the Petitioner and of SriV K YAGNA DUTT, Deputy
Solicitor General of India for Respondent No.1, M/s SANTHI CHANDRA,
Standing Counsel for Respondent Nos. 2 to 6:

WP NO: 6504 OF 2024:

Sohveaan

a4

i. The Superintendent of Fost Offices, Mr. Ravuri Phani Prasad, Gudivada
division, Gudivada - 821 301,

fad

The Postmaster, Head Post Office, Nugvic- 521 207. (Merged with
Head Fost Off fice Gueivada w.e.f 01.01.2020)

. Petitioners

AND

{. The Union of India, Represented by is Secretary(Revenue), Ministry of
Finance, Depariment of Expenditure, Room No. 76, New Delhi -
410001, |
The Assistant Commissioner of Central Tax, CGST Division, Aulonagar,
Vilayawada-820 007
The Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Guntur Central
Revenue Bullding, 0.No.9-40-15, Ring Road, Gunftur-528 006

ns

3


ra

4. The Superintendent (Appeals), Office of the Commissioner of Ceartral
Excise (Appeals), Guntur Central Revenue Building, O.No.3-80-15, Ring

xf

Road, Guntin-S22 005

CF

Deputy Director, ONrectorate General of GST intelligence,
Visakhapatnam Zonal Unit, D.No.28-14-17, Surya Bagh, Besides
Melody Theatre, Visakhapatnam ~ S8d0s0.

. Respondents

Patition under Article 2288 af the Constitution of India is fled praying that
in Ihe circurnslances stated in the affidavil {Ned therewith, the High Court may

af Wirt of MMancamus

es

he Weased to issue a wri more particularly in the {
declaring the action of the Respondents, oarticularly, the Respondent No.1
Le. Assisiant Commissioner of Central Tax, COST Civision, Vileyawada in

Oi besides Impasing a penalty of

ee

imoasing the Service Tax Rs. Rs.29,00,
Rs.25,00, 791/- under Section 78 of Finance Act, Rs. 1G.000/. under Sectian

* :

f@tt ya) of Finance Act, 1994 and 10,000) uncer section 7¥(2) of the Finance
Ach ioudby way of Order in Original No. as/eoes- 23/4
GGarTvdAST dated 2S O08. 2022as Segal, without jurisdiction, arbitrary,
viddative of principles of natural justine, without authority of law, and vicistive

of Anicie 14 and Article 19¢ No). of the Ganetitution of incia

JA NO; 7 OF 2024:

Petition under Seclian 7S) CPO is filed praying that in ihe
ciroumsiances stated in the effidawt fAlad in support of the wri petition, the
High Court may be pieased in suspend the oneratian of the arders issued
vide Respondent No.1 order no. S5/20ee- So/Asst CommyCasrVul aS? dated
28.08.2022 wherein the demand of Rs.25,.00,791/ towards service lax was
confirmed and a penally of Rs 25,00, 797/- was me under Section 7S of
Finance Aci, 1994 and ordered to be paid within thirty days besides imposing

further penalties of Rs. 10,000/ each uncer Section ¢* (1 Nal and 7Yf2) af


ES

Finance Act 1994 in the interest of justice, pending disposal of WP 8504 of

S024, on the fie of the High Court.

The petifion corning on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the
affidavit fled in support thereof and the earlier order of the High Court dated
44.03.2024, 15.03.2024, 26.04.2024 & 27.06.2084 made herein and upon
hearing the argurnents of Si Venna Hemanth Kumar (Central Government
Counsel} for fhe Patitionears and of SriVoK Yaghna Dutt, Deputy Solicitor
General of India for Respondent No.1, Ms.Santhi Chandra, Standing Counsel

for the Respondent Nas. 2 to 4;

WP NO: 6794 OF 2024:

Sebween:
{. The Superintendent of Post Offices, Represented by Mr. SSVAK Kumar
Gudur Division, Gudur - 524 104,

. The Posimaster, Head Post Office, Gudur- 524 704

oe

Petilioners
AND
1. The Union of India, Rep by iis Secretary, Ministry of Finance,
Department of Expenditure, Room No.7S, New Delhi? 10007

. The Additional Commissioner af Central Tax, Nellore Sub

hes

Commisioneraie, COST Division, Magunia Layout Nellore-S24 003

y

<a

The Commissioner of Central Tax (Appeals), Guntur CGS
Commisionarale, Rannavanihnota, Gurtur-Sad 004
4, The Superintendent (Reviews), Office of the Commissioner af Central
Tax, Rannavarithota, Guntur-S22 004

Respondents

Petition under Article 228 of the Constitution of India is fled praying that

in the circumstances stated in the affidavil fled therewith, the High Court may


be pleased fo issue a writ more particularly in the form of Writ of Mandamus
declaring the action of the Respondents, particularly, the Respondent Noo

e.. Additional Cornmussioner of Central Tex, Nellore Sub Cornmisionerate
GGST Division, Nellore in imposing the Service Tax of Rs.S0,58,945/. along
with interest, a penally of Rs 80.58. 945/. under section 7S, penalty of Rs.
TQ,.000/- under section #71 NA}, and Re, 10,000). under section ?Y(2) of the
nm Original No. O82 No NLR-EXCUS-ADC-

S2-2020-21-S Tax Dt 16.04 9021 as Megal, without jurisdiction, arbitrary,

Finance Act, 1994 by way of Cirder |

agaal

viniation of principles of natural justice. without authority of lew, and vidlation

of Articles 14 and Article 1a(Ng) of the Constitution of incia.

iA NO: 4 OF 2024

Peffion under Section 147 CPC is fied praying that in the
rcumetances stated in the affciavil fded in support of the writ petition, the
High Court may be pleased to suspend fhe operation of the orders &
consequent reco issinsel vide Respondent No.l order no. Gfo No NLR-
EXCUS-ADC-032.2020-21-8.Tax OL Ta O4¢ 2027 wherein Service Tax of
Re.50,58 248) along with inferest, a penalty af Rs 50, 58,948) was imposed
under Section 78 of Finance Act, 1994 and ordered to be gai within thi
days. Further a penalty of Rs. 10.000). each under Section FY (Ma) & FF)
of Finance Act 7884 in the interest of fustine, pending disposal of

WEP No. S734 of 20¢4, on the file of the Hich Court

The petifion corning on for hearing, upan perusing the Petition and the
alidavil fled in support thereof and the order of the High Cour, dated
18.03. 2024, 26.04.2024 & 27.06.2084 made hersin and upon pearing the

arguments of Sr G. Sal Narayana Rao, Advocate far the Petitioner, and of Sc

tren

dupudi Vk Yagna Dull, Deputy Solictor General for respondent No.) and of

Ms. Santhi Chandra, learned Junior Standing Counsel for CBC. for

respondent Nos 2 fo 4


Sad

WP NO: 7448 OF 2084:

Sotween:
1. The Superintendent of Past Offices, Kurnoal Division, Kurnool $718004
The Postmaster, Kurnool Head Post Office, Kurnoal- 578001.
Petitioners

fs

AND
. The Union of india, Represented by its Secretary, Ministry of Finance,
Cepartment of Expenditure, Room No.78, New Delhi 176 004.
2. the Commissioner of Central Tax, GST Commissionerate, Tirupall -
S77 502.

The Additional Commissioner of Central Tax, Go The Commissioner of

tad

Central Tax, GST Commissionerate, Tirupati - 577502.
4 The Assistant Co: sioner of Cenfral Tax, Kurnool, COST Division,

Kurnool.

on

. The Superintendent of Central Tax, Kurnool - 1 COGST Range, Kurnoal,.
8. Joint' [Nrector, O/o. Directorate General of GST inteliigence,
Visakhapatnam Zonal Und, D.No.28-14-17, Surya Bagh, Besides

Melody Theatre, Visakhanpatram-S300s0.

oJ

. The Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Railway Station Road,
Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh - 818004.
_ Respondents

Fatition under Anicie 228 of the Constitulion of India is Med praying that
in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fled therewith, the High Courl may
be pleased to issue a writ more particularly In the form of writ of Mandamus
declaring the Grder in Original No.O1/8021-S.Tax (ADC) dated 18.02.2021
confirming the demand and recovery of Rs.86.09,280/- of service tax inclusive

cesses payable on the taxable services viz, "Courier Agency Service, Lie
Insurance Service and Business Auxillary service" provided during the period

fram O1.04.2074 to 30.06.2017 under section 73(2) of Finance Act, 1984 and


ies
ie @ Prone fooon 4 pon
St ny
we yw Ga 2 EY
wer ns voree 7
Jes om th. po os
Lh. 43 att fy ee
¢ Rd,
ns pe nd
oO oe SO pen .
eg eK
fn Sec ae = ee we
fe. gee .
fh 5 & Be!
am oo fk oh th
wy x <> ie | OS s
= © % B mee
& fA we IM
DS ob 6 O
& % ag? en Cs 4
oe a oo aan
of i of ee opm tas me
te (i the fe "cere
© wy sO
Ped 4 F
Kes an A
BS & & &@ Gu &
a gg OS
oA a, saad onde
fm "a We Pk
jn on a a re)
rn sa on <a ca oe
we . 6000 Hi yon,
'wed 0 @ C5 3 td
a ry an
8 Fp £2 ¢
i es wen the . Gene snobs
ae 6G on wage oh 4
fee ee
- Se a Soe 63
Yree Sh % Ad % pone rat
O mS) ©
( & ¥ ce "3 &
en cs od fat £s a *
am yrs o ,
wo os a
x a a
eee 4 thee?
ths at
oh. ee Pu
Gy Pre
; Wid es
¢ o
is ed

ustice and Woks
nly set aside

3
.

}
er

' Respondent fo withhold
>

AAAGHOO?IF as egal, art

n
and

natural i
LSOTISeQUS

g
AC,

&

4 under

a praying

s,

"~

tespondent fo withhold
GHOO?P IF in

i subsequent N

7 an
AA

A

>

(OF 2084

= OF 2024

oo

rs
x
.
x

y

wwiances stated in the affictayvis

20

+

_

mPcu?

High Court may be pleased fo direct the

circumslances stated in
steps against the Petition

iA NO
IA NG
PON No.


Section TOC Kclissued by 4" Respondent, pending disposal of WP No. 7148
of 2024, on the fle of the High Court.

The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Pelition and the
affidavit led in support thereof and the earlier order of the High Court dated
TOS 2024, 26.04 2024 & 27.06.2084 made herein and upon hearing the
arguments of Sr G.Arun Showrl, Advocate for the Petitioners and of sr
Jupudi Vk Yagnadutt, learned Central Govemment Standing Counsel for
Respondent No.7 and of SrY_.N Vivekananda, Advocate for Respandant Nos.
zios

WP NO: 7448 OF 2024:

Sehweean:

1. The Superintendent of Post Offices, Markapur division, Markapur -
Bed3te
The Pastraster, Head Post Office, Markapur HO- 523316.

i

Petitioners
AND
1. The Union of india, Rep by iis Revenue Secretary, Minisiry of Finance,
Department of Expenditure, Room No./8, New Delhi -7710007,

Ba

The Additional Cornnissioner of Central Tax, Nellore sub

Gammissionerate, Nellore

ros

The Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Central Revenue
Building, D.No.3-30-175, Ring Road, Guntur-Sa¢ 006 |

4. The Superintendent (Appeals), Office of the Commissioner of Central
Excise (Appeals), Central Revenue Building, D.No.3-30-75, Ring Road,
Gsunturde2 O05

Respondents

Fefition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying thal in the

crcumsiances stated in the affidavit Med therewl i, the High Courf may be


oS

a

x - :
SPIRO
ish

;

us

rt

oy

g

SAAS Ms oa WPHS Hope 5
VEEL
u

?

.

om
there we td oe "4
@Y 6 BBS "a CS
OS a ad "het Pee oe Cs
oe, ab Je % po OG Pom rs ay
Meee ale OE a OG f Bogs a
wy tS] oO ase on S. oO ne
sn, od os SD Fs ne ek ae
Do GE Se Cio ff 5 og © cased ord be ed wee rs pe
- agp het os, Seosee we 5h apa - ge i Begs "enna Koved _--
6 2 2 a or as mG he 6" PE & 5
an a oe ar, to es 6B oe A Ge we ES
ge Cae ba 3 pe cn on "4 ; 1
mt 6 EE hse Fe Ph SE ie or a - fh 7B
fe" Bot oh & L ee i OS ® a oh ty Bt
ne oad teen ce nh fab. Te Ld, Be Nae te es os A ie wen ey,
res tC ; y) % an: wey Tage os ore ree) ta pn
Sate o Le na on oe on a ey ed Lf steed be ra i "i. "eX hey oo, og
oe & RP Oo g ~ SB Ss as ee SS an ar no oS poe
faed oe bene oa ae i ne 4 fede per £4 A ?
~ & 8 |. em 2 « & be omnes oe Be
a es 42 ELE oa "ee hone ee we SS " ~~
Boe Bo 2 & 8 & & % ee Og fe eG
sn ro 2» & & oR & i Oo 8 o 8 fe
@ Dg of e & + bs Ben 2 we 6 Be ® mm &
i, eed th hese . t Pee £5. Pose 7 io a faee r when pon 83 on a eae wees
soos Soe & "| & F hed ~* x " oy en re
ed és . a ee % Les ny "rows ; steed x an bee hb "et ur os
f 8 PS e G2. "gy & Bom & ew So 2
o 2 £ wi & ao Pe x i BK ke Se
$3 Sy fee w os cd a fe " a % ie a cc pe 4 oy my ff xe
ben sh sn Boe fh Rg 4 ing 4 ae Woo gy
ws D wy tet " ~~ o we an ; im tT ety
es + Mt ne Se 0 ae os) pee "hed i fa one hy oO on % a
. oO a us Fax ay, be83 ,
ee Ces '2 of 2 Q "= we Be St ot
Ba x & SS ke ty 5 1g 4 oH oo 4 a 2B
4 a os one es "eee noes 1, ' ed "Meee, 'aire gree
lin fe Se SP ny anes ws f%4e fy ee. ee Py we KS
Ge <- & 8 oo mm By & oe tet Gn A
© tig eM Cy es GF «A ka" pn bebe a ° Co od iF Oy Ok, xo bsg
ong of am, ann ae a ar 3 OB a ae ;
o. pe "oy Co Seee as Oo en gen nes we a as
as a oes "a "a ao eee ae had eee ran £4 ih Gok Song pan rey] err a ts te,
ig " 4 wae Ee me +s 3 ty o ve CS ogg a2 wm wo a en
Hea 4h RG es BM we © % a oo te os oe oe we Go
os nn a bon ee te wo ¢ 'Se SS be ae
@6 2 6 é€ = 8 €¢e¢ 22 O 2 2 £ 8 eS
eo us % foe aes ee ns ee Baim, Ie
GS go 6 ® & a aa me te i & 6 8 NY
sehen, we i ° anes, wt hy f Gok eee aa oy iA Eeaeee, a
one ~ Z a, wee
% sa: ae Ch By shee a we wou is ;
ye nt Bs , fe eB gy BY x
Eo B & nD ge te % @ lm oo 2 mm
Se j a ' ie SA i i eB hy ad
Be & om i "h, cH i hy - de Be F as ge es ae ©
Cake en 5 fw ie we gs ar bd fy Pte fin ee % , Ro
en eo Box Go a > yey Oe 1 Om G@ #3 "
oieee c " ae, . he, a tem, ng, 5 % wae
aan ne i A he Ye 2S Oo z # Oo &
GQ , Oo & Gf om & 2 gs es & @ yf te ee Od oY
k "iri pte, "n hal z P Jones ood "4 > ee pcs ~ a y ¥)
" 6 2 e S$ woe & mene) & @& 8 tx & Bom @ &
Ne 68) ro) "ad %, Cy boven. re, booed Moot noes apeoe $ wt on Z, te wen
-& 6 89 ¢g e%° 2 2 ES Seeds o
poe Le ne ; hs £3 £3 JB fiots nen od ay we 8 f .
ao fw " "@ Be S 2 = roe s @ 8B 24 £2 5S BO as
te gS oy * a * Boek oe & % "eee * Oo % ra se ee fH & Ss aN
see PELL SR ee the ef ms S&S 2e 8 8
eee oe ' C3 tan oye agen on ORS as 4 ke ¢ Tod
@ ih BB aa aa & " " oO % «$8 Ps Np OE oo Be B
we ops a & & ay me od -- Cw cn, Yee bbe tM re
pe my w My are g 3 ; foe ane: em «ES ; ee i se s
ca fom mat Beew nh ary) Pee) i x ; + : 5 OE
rs BS eSB 2S Zs B % Q 6 22 5 ee & %
BS tap ~ fe ns Se oe af "op m& © C3 23 it
fee Re CR OS ey aa 3 fA fo
re: gE i mG Sb Bom os a3
peered me vane i] uae z bee sheet neal ou '
me & OS we BY @ te So
cae Ce 'O eo & fog hn "E23
pam ge £3 wy Z nn 3 eee?
Be fe he o i ds
'Fo

y Court.

r
g

ig

&
S

fe of fhe

; a} of WE"
Panding disposal of \


3S

The petition coming on for hearing, upan perusing the Petition and the
affidavit fled In support thereof and the earlier order of the High Caourl dated
28.03.2024, 26.04.2024 & 27.08.2024 made herein and upon hearing the
arguments of SRILG SA] NARAYANA RAO, SC FOR CENTRAL. GOVT for
the Petitioners and of Smt Santhi Chandra, learned Junior Standing Counsel

for CRIC, for respondent Nos 2 to 4:

WP NO: 7449 OF 2024:

Sehween:
1. The Superintendent of Post Offices, Nellore Division, Nelliare 524 001.
2. The Postmaster, Naad Post Office, KRavall- S24 207.
Petitioners
AND
1. The Union of india, Represented by Revenue Secretary Ministry of
Finance, Depariment of Expenditure, Room No.76, New Dein 170004

2, Deputy Commissioner of Gentral Tax, CGST Division, Nediore

3. Principal Commissioner of GST & Customs, (Appeals), Guntur
4. Superintendent, (Appeals), Office of the Principal Cammissioner of OST

& Customs (Anpeais), Guntur
Respondents

Patition under Article 225 of the Constitution of India is fled praying that
in the circurstances stated in the affidavit fled therewith, the High Courl may
be pleased to issue a writ more particularly in the form of Writ of Mandamus
declaring the action of the Respondents, paricularly, the Respondent No. 2
Le., Deputy 'Commissioner of Central Tax, GGST Division, Nellore in impasin
a penalty of Rs.31,14,1194 under Section 78, penalty of Rs.70,000/- under
Section 77 CTA) ,and Rs.10000/- under section 77(2) of the Finance Act, 1994
by way of fetter no. OfO No. NLR-DC-46-2020-21- ADUN-ST, dated
25.03. 2021as egal, arblirary and consequently set aside the lelter no. QIO
No. NLR-DC-46-2020- 21-ADJN-ST, dated 26.023. 2021;

my


iA NO: 1 OF 2024

NER ke

Petfion urmier Section ~57 CPO is fled praying that in the
cirmcumstanoes sisted in the grounds fled In support of the petition, the High
Court may be pleased fo suspend the operation of the Respondent No.2 lefties
No. NLR-DC-46-2020-2 1-ADIN-ST, dated 28.03.2021 wherein a penally of Rs
S1,74,179/ - was imposed under Section 'f8 of Finance Act, 1994 and ordered
to be paid within thinly days. Further a penalty of Rs. 1O.000/- each under
section 7? (A) & FFi2} of Finance Act 1984 in the interest of fustice,
Pending disposal of WP 7449 of 2024. on the fe of the High Court

The petiion coming an for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the

ajidavil fed in sugport thereof and the earher order of the High Court dated

'ond

26.03.2084, 28.04 20284 & 27.06.2024 made herein and upon hearing the
arguments of Sri G SAI NARAYANA RAO SC FOR CENTRAL. GOVT for th
Petitioners and of SmiSanth! Chandra, learned Junior Standing Counsel fr

CBG, for respondent Noss to 4

WP NO: 7488 OF 2024:

Between:
The Senior Suoerinfendent of Post Offices, Visakhapainam Division,
Visakhapatnam S3000%.

Tre  Fostreaste, Head Rost Offse, Visakhapatnam AQ.

Visakhapatnan: 830007

Petitionsr

oN

J. Union of india, Represented by fs Secretary, Ministry of Finance, North
Block, New Delhi, 110007.


Lad
+

The Additional Commissioner of Customs & Central Tax,

Mh

Visakhanainam Central GST Commissionerate, GST Bhavan,

Vinakhapainan-530035.

The Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Central Tax, Visakhapainam

Central CGST Division,

4. The Superintendent of Central Tax, Dandaparthy COST Range, Central
COT Divisian, Visakhanainam CGST,

Additional Director, Directorate General of GST Intelligence,

ee

cht

Visakhapainam Zonal Unit, D.No.28-14-17, Surya Bagh, Besides
Melody Theatre, Visakhapainam 530020.
Respondents

Feiiion under Anicie 225 of the Conatitution of india is Hed praying that
in the OrCuMBslanc es stated In the affidavit fled therewith, the High Caurt may
be oleased to issue a writ more particularly In the form of Writ of Mandamus
declaring the Crder-in-Original VSP-EXCUS-ADC-56/22-23 dated 37.07.2023
in confirming the demand of Rs. 1,91,72,480. as Service Tax inclusive of
Cesses payable on the tayable services vic, "Courler Agency Service,
insurance Auxillary Service and Business Auxillary Service" provikied during
the period from 01.04.2014 to 30.06.2017 under Section 73(2) of the Finance
Act, 1983 and thereby imposing penalty of Rs. 1,81,72,400/- under sub-
section (1} af Section 78 of Finance Act, 1994, penalty of Rs.05,500 under
Section 70 of the Finance Act, for not taking registration within the prescribed
time and @ penalty of Re. 1G,000/- under Section 7?(2) of the Finance Act,
1994 for non-filing of ST-3 refurns as illegal, arblirary, high-handed anc
violative of princinles of natural justice and violative of Arficle 14 of ihe
Canstitulion of India and consequently fo set aside the Order-in-Onginal Ne.
VSP-EXCUS-ADC-S6/22-23 dated 34.01 20235.


eed

IANO: 1 OF 2024

Petition under Section 797 CPC is filed praying that in the
circumstances stated in the grounds Sed in support of the petiion, fhe High
Gourt may be pleased to suspend the operation of the Order-In-Original No
VOR-EXUUS-ADC-S0/82-23 dated S1.01.2024 forthwith fo direct the
Respondents to nai take any coercive sleps against the Petitioners, pending

disposal af WP 7455 of 2024, on the file of the High Court

The petition coming on for hearing, upon serusing the Petition and the
aidavil Hed in support thereof and the earller order of the High Court dated
26.03.2024, 28.04.2024 & 27.06.2084 mace herein and upon hearing the
arguments af Sint. Divya Datla, Standing Counsel for Central Government and
of SriiSanthi Chandra, learned Jurdor Standing Counsel for CBIC, for

respondent Nos.2 fo

WP NO: 7927 OF 2024:

Batween:
Phe Superintendent Of Post Offices, Markanur division, Markapur -
S23318
€. The Postmaster, Head Post Office, Foclli NO. 823240.
Patitioner
AND

1. TRe Union of india, Rep by iis Revenus Secretary, Ministry of Finances,
Oepariment of Expencditure, Roar Na 75, New Delhi -1 10004,
2 The deputy Commissioner of Central Tax, OGST Division, GST Shavan

eng

Annarnayya Circle, Magunia Layout, Nellore-S24 003.

a
tod

3. The Commissioner of Central Tax and Custoris (Appeals), Central

Revenue Bullding, O.No.3-30-75, Ring Road, Guritur-S22 006


a3
Oo

4 The Superintendent (Agpeais), Office of the Commissioner of Central
Excise (Appeals}, Central Revenue Building, D.No.3-20-15, Ring Road,
Gunrturoee GOS

Respondents

Petition under Anicie 226 of the Constitution of India is fled praying that
in the circurnstances steted in the affidavil fled therewith, the High Gourl may
be pleased to issue a writ more particulary in the form of Writ of Mandamus
declaring the action of G) the 2° Respondent, ia. Deputy Commissioner of
Central Tax, Nellore in confirming that the Pettioners are Hable to pay an
arsount of Rs.24.97,197/ for provision of laxable services in terms of the
orovision to Section 731) of Finance Act, 1994 and ordering racavery of same
beskies imposing a penalty of Rs.24.97,191/. uncter section 75, penalty of
Rs.10,000/ under section 77(1 A) and Rs.16,0004 under section 77(2) of the
Finance Act, 1994 by way of Order In Original No. NLR-DC-39-2020-21-
ADJIN-ST dated 15.01.2021 and Gf} the #° Respondent in upholding the
arders of the 2°° Respondent and relecting the appeal filed by the Petitioners
vide No. GUN-EXCUS-000-APP-104-2022-23 his Order-in-Appeal dated
14.07 2022as iNegal, without jurisdiction, arbitrary. violative of orinciples of
natural justice, without authority of law, and violative of Article 74 and Article
79C Na) of the Constitution of india

IA NO: 1 OF 2084

Patifion under Section 157 CPO is fed praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High
Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the @) Order In Original
C.NO. no.NLR- OC-39-2020-21-ADJN-ST dated 15.07.2021 passed by
Respondent No. 2 wherein the demand of Re. 24,97,191/- towards service tax
was confirmed and a penalty of Re.24,91,191/- was Impnsed under Section 78

of

of Finance Act, 1994 besides imposing further penalties of Rs. 10,000/-each



under Section

Appeal No.GUN-EXCUC4¢

DO.ARP-TO4-S022-29 dated 11.07 209 2d passed by

ony wet ree . fo gteky ON ed ene fae
Pete} OF Finance Act 1994 ane Gp Croker in.

Respondent in the interest of jusshics

af 2024, on the He of the High ¢

Recs

The pelfGon corning on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the
affidavit fled in support thereof and the order of the High Court, dated
02.04 2024, 26.04 2024 & 27.08.2024 made herein and pan hearing the
arguments of Sn G SA NARAYANA RAG sc POR CENTRAL Gov,
Ady dvocate for the Petitioners and of

ndent No.1, SR} SANTH! CHAN?

by

Noxon od ow Talos» mex weyd  y oat Faas
"eputy sorciior General of India fos

3
pe
wpe
"Yo
oh.

ovocate for the Respondent

WP NO: 8588 OF god:

Between:
ft. The Senior Superiniendent of Past Offices, Prakasam Division, Onaole

wt

2. The Pastmas ster, Head Post Offies, Chiraia HO. Se3755,

1. The Union of india, Rep by iis Revenue Sec retary, Ministry of Finance,
Department of Expenditure, Room No. 78, New Delhi 110001.

é. The Commissioner of Centra! Tas, Guntur CGS COMinasionerate,
Kannavarithota, Guntur-S22 004.

The Deputy Commissioner of Centr:

fea
3
£34
ah
a.
D
ot
bo
he
C4
ah
enewedg
iF
"ye
ft
oy

ONG. 294-749 GST Bhavan, Anfamayya Circe, MS

By-Pass Road, Nellore-524 003.



41

§. The Deputy Ctrector, Directorate Gereral of GST Intelligence,
Vijayawada regional Unit, D. Ne. 10-581 4 and 2nd floor, Abdul salam
Say Oy.

lowers, Bandar road, Ashok nagar, Vilsyawada - 520
S. The Superintendent of Central Tax, Chirala, Prakasam ONetrict - Se3

8 The Commissioner of Central Tax and Customs (Appeals), Central
Revenue Building, D.No.3-30-15, Ring Road, Guntur - 522 608,

?, The Superintendent (Appeals) Office of the Commissioner of Central
Excise (Agneais), Central Revenue Building, D.No.S-30-18, Ring Road,
Gumtur - 22 608,

Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that
in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fled therewith, the High Court may
be pleased fo issue a wit more particularly in the form of Writ of Mandamus
declaring the Orderin-Original No NLR-DC-37-2020-21- ADUN-ST dated
15.07.2027 In confirming the demand of Rs.20.22 S58. as Service Tay
inclusive of Cesses payable on the fexable services vig, Courier Agency
Service, insurance Auxiliary Service and Business Auxiliary Service provided
during the period fram 04.04.2014 to 30.08.2017 under Section P37} of the
Finance Act, 1904 read with Section 174 of CGST Act. 2077, a demand of |
balance Service Tax amount of Rs.4.09.000/- under section fais} of the
Finance Act, read with Section 174 of COST Act, 2017 and there eby imposing
penalty of Rs.20,22,858/- under sub-section (1) of Section 78 of Finance Act,
1834 read with Section 174 of CGST Act, 207%, penalty of Rs. 10,000 under
Section 77GMa} of the Finance Act, read with Section 174 of CGST Act, 2017
for not taking regisiration within the prescribed time and a penally af Rs.
70,000/- under Section 77(2) of the Finance Act, 1894 read with Section 174

of the GGST Act, 2017 for nomfiling of ST-3 refurns as Hiegal, arbitrary, high-
handed and violative of principles of natural justice and violative of Ariicle 14


NPADUN-

"2

No. NUR-DC-37-2020~

1 OF 2024

°
'N

iA NO

%

Ration

3

qirouiristanoes stated

St

¥
x

te

sed

riomay be pleas

3
z

COU

SS

3

mvih fo direct {

ys

OP 2027 fort

y
3

Ye Feiiion

yt th

agar

Respondents to not fake an

¥

he pelition camin

7

fon
ipan Aearing the

pe

erusing {he Path

Fy &
>

¥

arguments of Ms [i

;
&

yoocate far the Pet

>
X
At

Gener:

shor

c

Soh

>
s

S897 OF 2024:

«
°

WE NO

eS
a

Sehween

S23 004

ead |

i
g

2

The Postmaster, |

Petitioners

Department of Expen


s. The Gommissioner of Central Tay, Guntur CGST Commissionerate,
Mannavariihota, Guntur-See 004.
3. The Deputy Cormmissioner of Central Tax., Nellore CGST Division,

D.No. 24-7-48, GST Bhavan, Annamayya Circle, M.S.R. Layout, Mini
my-Pass Road, Nellore-Sg4 005

4. The Deputy Director, Directorate General of GST intelligence,
Visakhapainam Zonal Unit, D.No. 28-14-17, Surqya Bagh, Besides
Melody Theatre, Visakhapatnam-530 020.

The Commissioner of Central Tax and Customs (Appeals), Central

on

Revenue Building, D.No.3-30-15, Ring Road, Guntur-522 006,
8. The Superintendent (Appeals) Office of the Commissioner of Central
mxgise (Appeals), Central Revenue Building, 0.No.3-30-15, Ring Road,
Gunmur-822 008
The Superintendent of Central Tax, Ongole CGST Range, Kandukur,

ieee

Frakasam Oistrici-A2S 105.
Respondents

Patition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that
in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may
be pleased fo issue a writ more particularly in the form of Writ of Mandamus
seclaring the Order-in-Original No.NLR-DO-38-2020-21-ADJIN-ST dated
1S.O1 2027 In confirming the demand of Rs. (OPA BSE as Service Tax
inclusive of Cesses payable on the taxable services viz, Courler Agency
Service, Insurance Auxilary Service and Business Auxillary Service provided
during the period fram 04.04.2014 to 30.06.2017 under Section f{7} of the
Finance Act, 1904 read with Section 174 of CGST Act, 2017, a damand of
S{2} af fhe

Finance Act, read with Section 174 of CGST Act, 2017 and thereby imposing

'a
?

balance Service Tax amount of Rs.3.07,583/ under Section

penalty of Rs. 16,74,888/- under Sub-Sectian (1) of Section 78 of Finance Act,
1934 read with Section 174 of OGGST Act, 2017, penalty of Bs. 16,000/- under
eection 77( ia) of the Finance Act, read with Section 174 of CGST Act, 2017


g
~ uncer Ss
he pe
=

T
vit

aes $e teens hy geetmat wn oes ptt tay .
Ge Ee ETE Bot tt & i a a en es
P 7 a: ry a an oo iy fn ts
eu ¢ wot, * ye there 3 yr steve, coed where 3 oe re weg aA
a re arn ar, a anc a an ns
a vw EP pen fe @ oom 4B & Oo
i hen ao er rn a a : o ret Tt ge at,
tn ot _ os as fone & acs Ba % beet cw rs ia
epee rity ped Cad ag A 4 i 3. ' oer ee,
ne Mod: Goes Seve A chiens foe Sees! eed bn ued ee
fo Bf gd ton gh oc & 6 Bur B
ors 1,5 rh re! oo wot oad itt Ce wed ee aches
& cord A eg 7 ; Sa a ee
= OR Soke Bo tg os a i ad
be fa" a3 B53 OD Ay 2 ax *y %
ay Foe eed ae ae eer & treet ge sot et ved
esd choew, > 4 Sere ee Sone ne foroe, ney sranes
% ge G 2 & m 2 &  & D> . 6 fi
m= £ « B C oo $f RS OB. 2 Bm "ge ke
an ae Se Be ee o Gg S go @
tt "mY oe pO oe ee See
4 ae 6% pe pa a a edeee, Fas view toes rr "i
a 3 wente ax Keer ue Raa £e ee oh. ene "94 a 3 .
a © Se & 1 rr is an oe 4 te m &@ & Fe a Va
$e a Ch. we Ge nett Ae fre Be
eo ¢ & B® Sos " £ se om Ee,
eg & e 2 2 Pe BR Ge eT
we ' "Se ' ae son, bee eee eae dove
; ee fee" $i tas qe a ad ven i: 2 "ae yet C4 ween rn Pesen
gee a ead woe OS 75 i an cae i wd @ 'eas
y 4 4 ween, an beg Fused A 4 1"
ween, . is Be "ren a ; XG Bp te oo a ayers
Set nypet wad ohaed we tng [7 ret 3 sprue " 93 ge vetes .
a yn a a a a
[7 a es om B&O bee Dk
nese "Aes tore raoee, Ste yer, th 'af fs Le rn ee) XK y Ws
ie oe rr, eT ans ns
63 g OF a oo 8 ge OO my <n oe
4 , $ hee! "ht Ce Mee babe whet caed an we Soene, reeds, oo
a ne ca a . nnn?) or " a as rn snr c3
us An hy oe 43 oye feden "ES & C3 pet io) LN Shoe Le. 3 Ww
"5 us " a ie 7 i as fe a ot ° ease heed iii "Em
vA te REL ph ee oe i a
oan 2 nr On iapon 3 me bmn + a a OP ar: vs
a & Pg Os ed Gf The ED
£ oh ce & £5 gen titert 3 et ooo. 1 a fove xo .
. Ay % £54 M 'ere see cs f te "
wg O 2B ew ee eo ge GB
cE ow Kobe sere a ae wer ee 7 i
gee eee o, 5 i ¢ p Fi ed cond fs
Bo % BG oe #2? Oo «= 6 6 & ik Bt
an a. me em BG nr ae ae re
She . rs eon es Bove Ch 6G w& tg wee, . oo Si a er ahs reas
a ne po tat oes 3 ate. pr a a on wn aNd beoct eet aeen,
Se a gt es ey oe oy ff w f
i fm em bm gw ae! er ot 2
£5 Prone, Nord oR. pate z £%5 $ 4 5 aoe aye " fon ae
oe} Siem 5 age Fe pe veo ROS force oe eS
Soo om B 2 S a a a an ee G fo & 2 &
= ~ * "y ? 4 Laan ' oboe
be ee aes nn: an: mars) an ar Ba
oo tee [1 food ; OC Ch bt Py 4
ee OS od : a " is} Fm, " L By ee
OY, Ry be ORY oe fe Fm ww Ee a SOS 3s
pemee 'ad ra, wa 3 wee? % Css * seweny
eS uw B® ES S BAS & g OS & we
© $5 @ an o 2 & gg B %
7 ed a Pooe
, in | (KS 4 ebert See
a Bo a @ j "ie ae Bo
oe ees : a ws A 4
5 £3 45) a a
fe fae: oe
beh t3
- ben
g
é " 8
ra Ss Fe
pa ae rend
£5 m

o
iA NO: 1 OF 2024
ay
NOWNLR-DC-38-202

Responden

{
i
Ce
Nanded anc viok
e
disposal of WP

7, ood ° a
= oe @ *% 5 2
ar £5 of o s
ox wr there pres & the es
wee LS ta a ci) 8

YF
Advocate for the P

& following:

+
NN
u

¢, the Court race
O22 of 2025, S936 of SOS4, FAIS of

O24 along with WP Nos.41284 of

3

%s
%

8

o
*%

ode

2028, 8428 of 2023, 17963 of 2023, 2

2024 & TEST of 2024.

rm Noas. <3
3

a

"
-

Respond

for

sl

SUAS

oC

*
x

G
"List these matters on 34.0

Standin

ORDER

inferim order passed sarlier is extended NH the next date of hearing."

Sed} K: a RAIA BABY .

. ASSISTANT Soa TRUE COPYH 6 Ba ee SECTION OFFICER FOPe . .. ee Ta, 4, Gne CC io SRI DIVYA DATLA (CENTRAL GOVERNMENT COUNSEL) Advocate [ORUC)

2. Twos fo GP for Commercial Tax, High Court of AP (OUT) -

3. One CO to SRLY NLVIVERKANANDA, Advocate [OPUC] §. One GO to SRILG SAI NARAYANA RAG, SC FOR CENTRAL. . GOVT, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to SREVICYAGHNA DUTT, Deputy Solicitor General of india. FOPLC) 8S. One OC to SRIVENNA HEMANTH KUMAR (CENTRAL GOVERNMENT COUNSEL), Advocate. [OPUC] _ Cine CC to Deputy Solicitor General of india, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. fOPUC)

8. One CC toSRLGARUN SHOWR! <({ENTRAL GOVT, COUSEL) Advocate. [OPUC] One CC to Ms. SANTHE CHANDRA, Standing Counsel, High Courf of Andhra Pr adesh [OPUC}

1. Two spare copies ORL ost wf wD NESGH COURT DATED: 10.07 2024 LIST THESE MATTERS ON 24.07.2024 ALONG WITH WLP Nos.41254 of e022, 8429 of 2023, 1793 of 2OSN3, 23082 of BOSS, SS3S of 2094, 7215 of e024 & TES? of 2024 ORDER WRIT PETITION Nos. 10434, 4844, 4848, 5064, 8063, S167, 5170, 5343, 5377, $842, S888, 8724, 5753, 6135, 6804, 6734, M148, 7448, 7449, 7458, 7927, 8588 & S807 OF 2024 | INTERIM ORDER EXTENDED