| Sl. No. |
Contents |
Explanation |
| 1 |
Title & Ownership |
- Name, address of the prospector including E-mail ID,telephone number.
|
| - Details of period of prospecting/mineral right if any. |
|
- Details of exploration agency, qualification, experienceof associated technical persons engaged in exploration.
|
| 2 |
Details of the area |
- Village, District, State |
|
- Survey of India Toposheet No., Geo-coordinates of the areaof all corner points
|
|
- cadaster details of the area with land use, area underforest with type of forest
|
| - mineral(s) under investigation |
| 3 |
Infrastructure & Environment |
- Local infrastructure, host population, historical sites,forests, sanctuaries, national park and environmental settingsof the area.
|
| 4 |
Previous exploration |
- Details of previous exploration carried out by otheragencies/ parties.
|
|
- In case the area forms part of the area covered underearlier exploration then the same should be shown in a map withproper scale.
|
| 5 |
Geology |
- Brief regional geology of the area outlining the broadgeological, structural frame work.
|
|
- Deposit type, geological setting and details of dip,strike, old workings, surface exposures etc. of the area understudy also of adjoining nearby areas if the information islikely to have an impact on the area under study.
|
|
- Reliable geological map of appropriate scale withgeo-coordinates showing major lithological units, structural &tectonic features; extent of surface mineralisation, structure,location of boreholes, pits, trenches, old workings etc.
|
|
- Cross sections at suitable intervals showing verticalprojections of litho-units and mineralization.
|
|
- The extent and variability of the mineralization expressedas length (along strike or otherwise), plan width, and depthbelow surface to the upper and lower limits of the MineralResource.
|
| 6 |
Aerial/ ground geophysical/ geochemical data |
Details of aerial, geophysical & geochemical surveyresults taken up if any and their results.
|
| 7 |
Technological investigation |
- Details of technological investigation (pitting/trenching/ drilling etc.)
|
|
- Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results: Whetherthe data spacing and distribution is based on part I and II ofthe schedule and is sufficient to establish the degree ofgeological and grade continuity appropriate for the MineralResource estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied.
|
| 8 |
Location of data points. |
- Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes(collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings andother locations used in Mineral Resource estimation.
|
| - Quality and adequacy of topographic control. |
| 9 |
Sampling Technique |
Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut channels, randomchips etc.) and measures taken to ensure sample representivity.
|
| 10 |
Drilling technique& drill sampling employed |
- Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation, open-holehammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic etc.) anddetails (e.g. core diameter, triple or standard tube, collarR.L, azimuth, inclination, coordinates of bore holes etc.).
|
|
- Whether core and chip sample recoveries have been properlyrecorded and results assessed.
|
|
- Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensurerepresentative nature of the samples.
|
|
- Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery andgrade and whether sample bias may have occurred due topreferential loss/ gain of fine/ coarse material.
|
|
Logging: - Whether core and chip samples have been logged toa level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resourceestimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies.
|
| 11 |
Sub-sampling techniques and sample preparation |
- If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half orall core taken.
|
|
- If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary splitetc. and whether sampled wet or dry.
|
|
- For all sample types, the nature, quality andappropriateness of the sample preparation technique.
|
|
- Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-samplingstages to maximize representivity of samples.
|
|
- Measures taken to ensure that the sampling isrepresentative of the in situ material collected.
|
|
- Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size ofthe material being sampled.
|
| 12 |
Quality of assay data and laboratory tests |
The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying andlaboratory procedures used and whether the technique isconsidered partial or total.
|
|
Nature of quality control procedures adopted (e.g. standards,blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whetheracceptable levels of accuracy (i.e. lack of bias) and precisionhave been established.
|
|
Check analysis of atleast 10% of samples may be analyzed fromthird party NABL accredited/ or department of science &technology (DST)/ BIS recognized laboratories or governmentlaboratories for assessing the acceptable levels of accuracy.
|
| 13 |
Moisture. |
- Whether the tonnages are estimated on a dry basis or withnatural moisture, and the method of determination of themoisture content.
|
| 14 |
Bulk Density |
Whether assumed or determined. If assumed, the basis for theassumptions. If determined, the method used, whether wet or dry,the frequency of the measurements, the nature, size andrepresentativeness of the samples.
|
| 15 |
Resource estimation techniques |
- Discussion on sufficient data density to assurecontinuity of mineralization and synthesis adequate data basefor estimation procedure used.
|
|
- The nature and appropriateness of the estimationtechnique(s) applied and key assumptions, including treatment ofextreme grade values, domaining, interpolation parameters,maximum distance of extrapolation from data points.
|
|
- The basis for the classification of the Mineral Resourcesinto varying confidence categories.
|
| - The assumptions made regarding recovery of byproducts. |
|
- Detailed description of the method used and the assumptionsmade to estimate tonnages and grades (section, polygon, inversedistance, geo-statistical, or other method).
|
|
- Description of how the geological interpretation was usedto control the resource estimates.
|
|
- Discussion of basis for using or not using grade cutting orcapping. If a computer method was chosen, description ofprogrammes and parameters used.
|
|
- Geo-statistical methods are extremely varied and should bedescribed in detail. The method chosen should be justified. Thegeo-statistical parameters, including the variogram, and theircompatibility with the geological interpretation should bediscussed. Experience gained in applying geo-statistics tosimilar deposits should be taken into account.
|
| - Data verification and/ or validation procedures used. |
| 16 |
Further work |
- The nature and scale of planned further work (e.g. testsfor lateral extensions or depth extensions or large scalestep-out drilling).
|
| 17 |
Annexures/ enclosures to the report |
The report shall include all relevant data including maps,sections, logs, analysis reports, photographs etc. in support ofthe estimates made.
|
| 18 |
Any other information |
Any other information as may be available or required by anyauthority as prescribed
|