Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 20 (0.62 seconds)

Vishram Singh vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 20 September, 2019

Article 243S 3 THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH WP No.18639/2019 (VISHRAM SINGH Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH) provides for constitution and composition of Wards Committees, whereas Article 243U provides for duration of Municipalities. Election of the Municipalities is provided under Article 243ZA. Article 243ZG provides for bar to interfere by Courts in electoral matters. In the present case, determination of Extent of Wards has been challenged on the ground of unequal distribution of population. Thus, this Court is of the considered opinion that in view of the provisions of Article 243ZG of the Constitution of India, the validity of any law relating to delimitation of the constituencies or allotment of seats to such constituencies, made or purporting to be made under Article 243ZA cannot be called in question in any court. Thus, in the considered opinion of this Court, this petition is not maintainable in the light of Article 243ZG of the Constitution of India.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - G S Ahluwalia - Full Document

Rakesh Kumar Meena vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 1 October, 2019

He referred the judgment rendered by this Court in the case of Atendra HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH 2 Cr.A. No.8351/2019 (Rakesh Kumar Meena Vs. State of M.P. and Another) Singh Rawat Vs. State of M.P. & Others, 2019 (2) MPLJ (cri.) 481 to submit that anticipatory bail is maintainable. He undertakes not to move in the vicinity of the prosecutrix and her family members and would not be a source of embarrassment and harassment to the prosecutrix and her family members. Appellant further undertakes to cooperate in the investigation as well as trial and would make himself available as and when required. He further undertakes to do some community service. Thus, he prayed for grant of bail.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 2 - Full Document
1   2 Next