Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 46 (0.32 seconds)
Documents citing Bharat vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 1 September, 2023

Durg Singh Maurya vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 7 May, 2026

6. For the same allegations, FIR under Sections 420, 467 and 468 IPC has also been registered and is under investigation. Since the petitioner was acting as a quasi-judicial authority under the Code, he is entitled to protection under Section 3 of the Judges (Protection) Act, 1985. Reliance has been placed on the judgment dated 04.05.2026 passed in W.P. No.189/2020 (Virendra Kumar Katare Vs. General Administration Department and others), wherein in similar circumstances, Coordinate Bench quashed the charge-sheet.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sunetra Kelapure vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 30 April, 2024

Accordingly, since case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the aforesaid order, therefore the present writ petition is also disposed of on the same terms by holding that the order dated 28th February, 2024 passed by the Indore Bench of this High Court in W.P. No.4098 of 2024 (Smt. Nisha Kulkarni and others Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh and others) will apply mutatis mutandis in the present case also, unless it is set aside in the writ appeal or the SLP. If the said order is not set aside in the writ appeal or the SLP then, the said benefit be extended in favour of the petitioner within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - V Agarwal - Full Document

Shiv Bhawan Mishra vs D/O Post on 12 March, 2024

In view of the above discussions and also the case laws as referred to above, O.A. deserves to be allowed and is accordingly allowed. Respondents are directed to count the past services of the applicants towards RTP w.e.f. March, 1983 for the purposes of pensionary benefits including pension. The aforesaid drill shall be completed within a period of four months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Allahabad Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ashok Ramchandra Nawle And Ors vs Posts on 9 December, 2024

In the matter of dearness and other allowance and the need for maintaining equality between wages of casual workers and salary, etc. of regularly appointed Telephone Operators, the order of Supreme Court dated 28.7.1985 in the case of All India Telegraph Engineering Employees Union Vs. Union of India & Another has also been cited by the Petitioners besides some other rulings.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 Next