Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 16 (0.55 seconds)

Naresh And Another vs State Of Haryana on 29 August, 2008

In the case of Kanshi Ram v. State of M.P.2001 (4) RCR 556, the Apex Court has held that the plea of self defence could be taken in cross examination of prosecution witnesses or in the statement of the accused under Section 313 Cr.P.C.or by adducing evidence if the accused had failed to specifically took the plea of right of private defence even then it could be taken on the basis of Criminal Appeal No.486-DB of 1998 8 evidence on record.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Sabina - Full Document

Kanshi Ram vs State Of H.P. & Others on 30 July, 2024

Petitioner, in present case, has assailed order dated 27.4.2017, passed by the Divisional Commissioner, in Appeal No. 645 of 2016, titled as Kanshi Ram Vs. State of H.P. through Range Forest Officer, whereby his eviction from the forest land in R.F. Ghaton comprising Khasra No. 400/308/4, measuring 05-19 bighas of Mauza Kajwa Tehsil Sangrah, District Sirmour, H.P., as directed vide order dated 31.8.2016, passed by Collector-cum-Assistant Conservator of Forests, Renuka Ji, District Sirmour, H.P., in case No. 12/SG/2015-16, has been affirmed.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - V S Thakur - Full Document
1   2 Next