Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.26 seconds)

Ntpc Limited Kol Dam Barmana vs Respondents on 15 December, 2017

3. It is not in dispute that appeals arising out of similarly situated claimants as also very same acquisition proceedings, arising out of very same notifications under Sections 4 and 11 of the Act, already stand dismissed by this Court vide judgment dated 11.1.2017, passed in RFA No. 510 of 2012, titled as NTPC Ltd. Kol Dam vs. Lalman & another. The present Appeals are squarely covered by the said decision. Such fact is not disputed. As such, as jointly prayed for, the present Appeals stand disposed of, in terms of the said judgment. Directions issued in the aforesaid decision shall mutatis mutandis apply to the instant cases also. Pending application(s) if any, also stand disposed of accordingly.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - S Karol - Full Document

Ntpc Limited Kol Dam Barmana vs Respondents on 15 December, 2017

3. It is not in dispute that appeals arising out of similarly situated claimants as also very same acquisition proceedings, arising out of very same notifications under Sections 4 and 11 of the Act, already stand dismissed by this Court vide judgment dated 11.1.2017, passed in RFA No. 510 of 2012, titled as NTPC Ltd. Kol Dam vs. Lalman & another. The present Appeals are squarely covered by the said decision. Such fact is not disputed. As such, as jointly prayed for, the present Appeals stand disposed of, in terms of the said judgment. Directions issued in the aforesaid decision shall mutatis mutandis apply to the instant cases also. Pending application(s) if any, also stand disposed of accordingly.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - S Karol - Full Document
1