appeal before the Employee's Provident Fund Appellate
Tribunal (for short, EPFAT). The Respondent, thereafter filed
an appeal before EPFAT ... EPFAT heard the matter and by order dated 24.06.2010,
dismissed the appeal and the said copy is at Annexure -M.
5
5. Respondent had challenged
Employees Provident Fund
-6-
Appellate Tribunal (Procedures) Rules, 1997 (For short
'EPFAT (P) Rules') for a direction to the respondent to
refund ... filing the appeal,
an interlocutory application under Rule 7(2) of the EPFAT
(P) Rules 1987 was filed seeking condonation of delay.
When appeal came
before the Employees' Provident
Funds Appellate Tribunal (for short 'the EPFAT')
which is pending consideration.
2. Reasons for approaching this Court ... that
the EPFAT has failed to consider the petitioner's
interim prayer. It is for the petitioner to make
necessary endeavor to consider
till
constitution of the Employees' Provident Funds Appellate
Tribunal (EPFAT) at Bangalore. Accordingly, after hearing the
matter, the Delhi High Court ... impugned order dated 31.05.2012.
5. Subsequent to the constitution of the EPFAT
Southern Bench, Appeal No. 428 (6)/2016 was transferred to
Bangalore Bench
sent to both the parties.
Sd/-
(R.L. Koli)
Presiding Officer, EPFAT"
3. This Court in Writ Petition No.67510/2010
Employees' Provident
Fund Appellate Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1997 (for short,
'EPFAT Rules') was dismissed by the Labour Court.
2. Heard the learned ... appeal as barred by limitation
under Rule 7(2) of the EPFAT Rules, aggrieved by which, the
petitioner is before this Court
ANNX-I TILL THE
DISPOSAL OF THE STATUTORY APPEAL FILED BEFORE EPFAT,
BENGALURU IN APPEAL NO. EPF 38/2024 9AS PER ANNX
appeal
is filed beyond the period prescribed under Rule 7(2) of EPFAT
Rules, 1952. Hence, the present writ petition.
2. We have heard
filed beyond the period prescribed under Rule 7(2) of
EPFAT Procedure Rules, 1952.
2. We have heard the arguments of Shri K.S. Abhijith
complete the service and pleadings.
Sd/-
(R.L. KOLI)
Presiding Officer, EPFAT
15.05.2009"
3. Subsequently, vide notice dated 22.11.2010, the
petitioner was notified that
