said order was challenged before the appellate authority
under HOER and Jt. Secretary, Govt. of India by the Railway
Administration. The said appellate authority passed ... submitted that the Tribunal ought to have considered that Rule 3 of
HOER provides criteria for determining the classification. The
workload and attentiveness required depends
Work and period of Rest) Rules, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as HOER Rule 2005) classified in four categories, i.e., (i) intensive (ii) continuous ... category since inception of the said gates.
5. Under the above mentioned HOER Rules 2005, there is a certain provision for change in classification
excluding wages for Overtime work or Bonus)
b) Railway employees governed by HOER
All the items as shown in (a) above except House Rent
Allowances
petitioner to s¢
Beene despite the same does
not require a Hoers woe The pe etitioner is" therefore belbre
this Court.
re the iearned
AGRICULTIRIST
ALL ARE B/t> CETRRE LALLI
VILLAGE, HAR, ALA,
HOERLI, CHITRADUERGA TALITE RESPONDENTS -
Thes MPA is fled under sectins:. 1730) oF. Motor
Verio
cadre keeping in view the administrative requirements.
10.2 The Personnel, Welfare and HOER Inspectors should be merged and a unified cadre of Personnel Inspector introduced
Thuravur Station from "Essentially Intermittent" to "Continuous" under HOER on
the basis of job analysis conducted. He submits that in view
figure at all in the original application. He added
that interpretation of HOER is beyond the purview of the RTI Act . He further stated that ... that in the representation the
Appellant had that the interpretation of the HOER by the Railway Board is not correct and hence it
should
East Railway,
Bilaspur about the subject matter of a letter No. 350E/HOER/O(Policy) dated 27.02.2004 of Railway
Board. He, in addition, also desired
points related to the with regard to "statutory provisions of HoER and
Railway Servants (Hours of work and period of Rest), Rules
