Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.46 seconds)

State vs Chander Bhan & Ors Fir No.336/2013 Ps ... on 17 December, 2018

15.13. Moreover, Ct. Ravinder Hooda from PCR was examined by the prosecution as PW-15 and he in his testimony categorically stated that the information that he received at PCR from phone number 9999600424 was "Mere ladke ke mere chacha ke lake ne goli mar di hai, need police". The said witness was not cross examined despite opportunity and his testimony in this regard remains unrebutted and unchallenged. The said witness also stated that the informant told him that he was Pawan Sessions Case No. 56482/2016 Page 27/60 State Vs Chander Bhan & Ors FIR No.336/2013 PS Ranhola U/s 302/34 IPC & 30 Arms Act Solanki, however, as regards same the court is of the opinion that Pawan Solanki could not have given information himself in view of his medical condition and it is a possible that PW-2 Bhagat Singh made call from phone of Pawan Solanki.
Delhi District Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1