Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.37 seconds)
Documents citing Sabir Kha vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 20 May, 2021

Mohammad Tokir vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 8 May, 2025

Learned counsel for the applicant, in addition to the grounds mentioned in the application, submits that the applicant is falsely implicated in this matter. The chemical analysis report of C.F.S.L. Bhopal with regard to contraband Mephedrone, was not submitted alongwith the charge-sheet, therefore, charge-sheet was incomplete. Learned counsel referring to the order dated 05.11.2024, passed in M.Cr.C. No.32575/2024, order dated 11.12.2021 and 13.12.2021, passed in S.L.A.(Crl.) No(s)8164-8166/2021 by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, order dated 01.05.2023, passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in SLA(Crl.) No(s)11628/2022, order dated 04.12.2023 (Pankaj Gupta Vs. Narcotics Control Bureau), passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in SLA(Crl)No(s).12200/2023, order dated 21.11.2023, passed in SLA(Crl) No(s).43791/2023 [Pabitra Narayan Pradhan Vs. The State (NCT) of Delhi] and order dated 21.04.2025, passed in S.L.P. (Criminal) No.2993/2025(Jabir Kha Vs. State of M.P.) contends that the FSL report was tendered without filing the supplementary charge-sheet. Therefore, the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - S S Kalgaonkar - Full Document

Imran vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 17 April, 2026

The chemical analysis report of Forensic Science Laboratory was submitted on 13/08/2025. The chemical analysis report was taken on record by the trial Court on 26/09/2025 without any supplementary charge-sheet. Thus, the cognizance and the framing of charge against the applicant without considering the chemical analysis report were erroneous. Learned counsel referring to the order passed by the Supreme Court in the case of Mohd. Arbaz Vs. State of NCT of Delhi reported in 2020 SCC Online Delhi 2542 and the order dated 21/04/2025 passed in CRA no. 2088 of 2025 [Jabir Kha Vs. State of M.P.] contends that the applicant deserves grant of bail for the reason of incomplete final report submitted against him. Learned counsel further submits that the narcotic contraband was weighted with clothes and polythene bag. There is inconsistency regarding weight of the contraband. The applicant has undergone custody for one year, four months and fifteen days. The trial is not progressing at appropriate pace. The independent witnesses Faquir Mohd. [PW-1] and Munna Kha [PW-2] did not support the prosecution. The trial would take time to conclude. Jail incarceration is causing hardship to the applicant and the dependent family. Applicant is ready to cooperate in the trial.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - S S Kalgaonkar - Full Document
1