State of Odisha - Act
Gemstone Policy of Orissa, 1998
ODISHA
India
India
Gemstone Policy of Orissa, 1998
Rule GEMSTONE-POLICY-OF-ORISSA-1998 of 1998
- Published on 24 July 1998
- Commenced on 24 July 1998
- [This is the version of this document from 24 July 1998.]
- [Note: The original publication document is not available and this content could not be verified.]
1.
Gemstone occurrences of different varieties are found mostly in the district of Bolangir, Sambalpur, Subarnapur, Kalahandi, Nawapara, Phulbani, Koraput and Angul etc. Finds of gemstones in the late seventies attracted the attention of Government following which the State Directorate of Mining and Geology deployed their geological exploration units during 1978-79 to assess the resources. Instances of clandestine extraction and illegal trading of gemstone also came to light during this period, Accordingly with a view to preventing these unlawful activities and developing the gemstone resources on a systematic and scientific basis, a set of instructions were issued in the then Mining and Geology Department letter No. 11728 & No. 11735, dated the 31st October 1981 in which the Orissa Mining Corporation (OMC) was authorised to take up exploration mining in the districts of Bolangir, Sambalpur and Dhenkanal as an agent of the State Government. The area of operation was subsequently extended to other district.2.
In 1986 the State Government reserved certain areas in the State district of Bolangir, Sambalpur and Kalahandi by notifications for exploitation by the Public Sector (OMC) under the then Rule 58 of the Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 (deleted from M.C. Rules, 1960 by an amendment in the 13th April 1988. Subsequently several Notifications were issued under Rule 75 (2) during 1988 and thereafter appointing (OMC) as an agent of the State Government to operate in these areas. OMC was also authorised to form joint sector Companies and hold 51% share therein. The Notification issued during 1988 further stipulate that Orissa Mining Corporation would sell gemstone to Joint Sector Companies with a view to ensuring an uninterrupted supply of gemstone to lapidary units in the State. The Gemstone Corporation of Orissa Ltd. (GEMCO) was formed on the 4th January 1989 and OMC was authorised to open purchase centres to procure gemstone from the local people in order to check smuggling. Royalty was assessed on the purchase price paid by OMC, PL/ML for gemstone was granted to OMC alone in the areas reserved for the purpose. In 1991 exploration scheme was launched with UNDP assistance to identify and assess the availability of gem bearing area.3.
Gemstone Policy 1994 -4.
- 4.1. The Gemstone Policy, 1994 did not achieve the desired results due to following reason :(i)Under the policy a poor farmer or villager getting a piece of gemstone could sell it only to OMC whose representatives are not readily accessible and who take their own time for assessment of value and payment. As such he preferred to sell it clandestinely at throw away price through a middle man who took it away and sold it at higher price at centres of gemstone trade. This transaction deprived the finder of a legitimate price for the gemstone and the Government of the royalty. The clandestine trade only benefited the middleman and lower level officials to the detriment of the finder and the Government.(ii)Large scale scientific and commercial exploitation of the gem-bearing areas through public or private sector did not take place. The only joint venture exploitating a limited lease-hold areas also did not achieve the desired results. Due to lack of exploitation of gem-bearing tracks, the State Government have not been able to benefit from this sector. In fact, the royalty received annually from gemstone is only of the order of Rs. 4.5 lakhs which can increase manifold through a rational policy of wide scale exploitation of gemstone-bearing areas.(iii)Lapidary units for cutting and polishing of gemstone which would have provided local value addition, large scale employment and income to the State Exchequer became a casualty of the policy. Under the preventing regime of clandestine extraction and illegal trading of gemstone, genuine entrepreneurs wanting raw materials for the lapidary units were completely starved. A few lapidary units that come up in the State closed down for want of raw-materials.5. Legal Framework.
- 5.1. Gemstone is not the "specified mineral" indicated in the First Schedule of Mines and Mineral (Regulation and Development) Act 1957. In the first schedule, only "Precious stones" have been mentioned as major mineral requiring prior approval of Government of India for grant of PI/ML. The MMRD Act however, does not define precious stones. The gemstones found in Orissa in general are of "Semi-precious varieties" and as such do not come under specified minerals listed in Schedule-I of the Act. Accordingly the State Government is competent to grant PL/ML in respect of such gemstones without prior approval Government of India However, if precious stones are found during mining operation, the necessary approval is to be obtained by the lessee as per the provisions of MMRD Act and MC Rules.6. Parameters of the New Policy.
- The committee formed by the State Government to recommended measures for the new policy, has given its report in which the recommendations include :(a)throwing open 18 prospected tracts to prospective entrepreneurs including OMC for grant of mining liase.(b)time-bound exploration programme for the unprospected areas(c)continuance of OMC as agents of the State Government for the unprospected areas and granting of contract/sub-lease to entrepreneurs under OMC for exploitation of the areas.(d)selection criteria for parties for grant of mining lease.(e)grant of trading licence to parties including lessees for purchase of gemstone from all available sources including tenants in a competitive manner.(f)system of assessment of royalty on pre-determined pit's mouth value, etc.7. Selection Criterial for Grant of Mining Lease.
- Preference in grant of ML would be given to the parties on the following parameters :8. Condition of Leas.
9. Trading Licences.
- 9.1. Gemstone are an important Foreign Exchange earner and it may contribute sizeable revenue to the State Exchequer. With this in view, the Committee has recommended introduction of Trading Licence for collection of gemstones inside the State.10. Royalty.
- 10.1. Prior to the 11th April 1997, royalty on gemstones paid to State Government was calculated on the basis of sale price at pit's mouth as per the Second Schedule of the MM (RD) Act, 1957. This Act does not define the manner in which such sale price at pit's mouth is to be determined. State Government can formulate the modalities for fixation of this price. There are three ways in which it can be assessed.(a)by auction;(b)valuation by a group of experts including Government approved valuer, and(c)on pre-determined value.11.
The new Gemstone Policy, 1998 enumerated above is expected to have the following advantage :12.
The Gemstone Policy of Orissa 1998 will come into effect from the date of issue of the Notification.Annexure-I| Sl. No. | Name of the Gemstone | Colour/other characters | Price range per gram in Rupees | |
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | |
| 1. | Ruby (I grade) | Purplish red/flawless transparent | More than 1 caret | 6,000 |
| Less than 1 caret | 200 | |||
| 2. | Ruby (II grade) | Purplish red with slight flaw and less transparency. | 25 | |
| 3. | Ruby/Corundum (III grade) | Purplish to reddish, translucent to opaque. | 2 | |
| 4. | Sapphire (I grade) | Dark blue to blue, transparent flawless. | More than 1 caret | 6,000 |
| Less than 1 caret | 200 | |||
| 5. | Sapphire (II grade) | Dark blue to bluish, Violet blue with slight flaw and lesstransparency. | 25 | |
| 6. | Sapphire/Corundum (III grade) | Bluish, translucent opaque | 2 | |
| 7. | Alexandrite (I grade) | Clean, transparent with sharp colour change from green toviolate/red. | 1,000 | |
| 8. | Alexandrite (I grade) | Semi transparent to translucent with less flaw, colourchange from green to violated/red. | 500 | |
| 9. | Emerald (I grade) | Dark green transparent, Flawless. | 5,000 | |
| 10. | Emerald (II grade) | Dark green to light green with less transparency and flaw. | 500 | |
| 11. | Green beryld (III grade) | Dark green to light green, translucent to opaque. | 50 | |
| 12. | Aquamarine (I grade) | Bluish to sea green transparent, without flaw. | More than 10 grams | 400 |
| 13. | Acquamarine (II grade) | Bluish to greenish and lighter shades, semitransparent. | 50 | |
| 14. | Acquamarine (III grade) | Fractured | 2 | |
| 15. | Chrysoberyl, Cat's eye (I grade) | Yellowish green, transparent with chatyancy, eye effect. | 150 | |
| 16. | Chrysoberyl (II grade) | Yellowish green, transparent to semi-transparent. | 150 | |
| 17. | Chrysoberyl (III grade) | Greyish, greenish, transparent to semitransparent. | 4 | |
| 18. | Rhodolite Garnet | Reddish-purple, transparent without flaw. | More than 2 gms. | 10 |
| 19. | Garnet | Red, transparent without flaw | 1gms. | 0.50 |
| 20. | Garnet | Pink | 3 | |
| 21. | Garnet | Pinkishred | 1.50 | |
| 22. | Garnet | Honey yellow to yellow brown | Big size | 5 |
| Small size | 2 | |||
| 23. | Topaz | Coloured, Clean | More than 2 gms. | 1.50 |
| 24. | Topaz | Coloured fractured | 1 | |
| 25. | Topaz | Colourless fractured | 0.10 | |
| 26. | Others | 0.10 | ||
| 27. | Iolite | Blue, transparent flawless | More than 5 gms | 6 |
| 28. | Iilite | Fractured | 0.10 | |
| 29. | Silimanite, Cat's eye (Fibrolite) | Grey with cat's eye effect aboshon grade. | 2 | |
| 30. | Moon stone (I grade) | Milky fairly transparent with chatoyancy. | 0.50 | |
| 31. | Moon stone (II grade) | Milky, translucent to opaque with/without chatyancy. | 0.50 | |
| 32. | Amethyst | Violet | 0.50 | |
| 33. | Apatite | Blue, greenish, blue transparent | 0.50 | |
| 34. | Tourmaline | Blue, green, transparent flawless | 10 | |
| 35. | Citrine | Yellow, transparent flawless | 0.50 | |
| 36. | Smoky quartz | Grey, flawless | 0.50 | |
| 37. | Rock crystal (quartz crystal) | Colourless, transparent flawless | 0.10 |