Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 44 (0.31 seconds)
Documents citing Vijay Singh vs State Of M.P on 1 November, 2022

Omprakash vs Rajendra on 14 January, 2026

4. After that, one more objection was taken by the learned counsel for the plaintiff that if the defendants want to examine other attesting witness of the 'will' i.e. Ramesh Chandra Sharma, who is a witness of the same fact, therefore, both of the witnesses be examined one after another and thereafter he will cross-examine the witnesses and on this ground prayed for adjourning the case. This objection was also opposed by learned counsel for the defendants on the ground that other witnesses will be examined after completion of the examination of the one witness; and for this purpose, he relied upon a judgment of this Court in case of Laxman Singh v. The State of Madhya Pradesh reported in 2007 (I) MPWN 83 . This objection was also decided in favour of the plaintiff stating that if the defendants want to examine the other attesting witnesses of the 'will', then both of the witnesses be examined. The examination-in-chief of both the witnesses will be completed and thereafter they will be examined on the same day. The aforesaid adjudication of the objections gives rise to this petition.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 Next