Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.43 seconds)
Documents citing Dal Chand Ahirwar vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 14 February, 2012

Santosh Kumar vs Union Of India on 16 March, 2018

8. Learned counsel for the respondents on the other hand submits that post of ADIGP and that of Commandant are in the equivalent rank and only difference is that when a person works in the field, he is designated as 'Commandant' whereas when he functions in the office he is called 'ADIGP', therefore this ground of punishment being handed over by a inferior authority is not made out and thus, the law laid down in case of Dal Chand Ahirwar (supra) is not applicable to the facts and circumstances of the case.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Virendra Singh Sikarwar vs State Of M.P. on 6 March, 2024

Accordingly, as no Presenting Officer was appointed, the impugned orders are unsustainable in eyes of law as laid down by this Court in the matters of Ramesh Chand Rathore vs. State of M.P. & Others reported in 2010 (3) MPHT 32 and Dal Chand Ahirwar Vs. State of M.P. reported in I.L.R (2012) M.P.902 wherein this Court while dealing with the identical circumstances, quashed the impugned order of penalty.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - M R Phadke - Full Document
1   2 Next