Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 49 (2.30 seconds)

S.R. Srinivasa & Ors vs S. Padmavathamma on 22 April, 2010

21. A perusal of the aforesaid provisions would show that the basic aim of Section 15(2) is to ensure that inherited property of an issueless female Hindu dying intestate goes back to the source. It was enacted to prevent inherited property falling into the hands of strangers. This is also evident from the recommendations of the Joint Committee of the Houses of Parliament, which have been duly noticed by this Court in the case of State of Punjab v. Balwant Singh, 1992 Supp (3) SCC 108. The scheme underlying the introduction of the aforesaid provision had been discussed as follows:
Supreme Court of India Cites 22 - Cited by 144 - S S Nijjar - Full Document

Balwant Singh vs The Punjab State Through The Collector on 12 November, 2009

RFA No. 2558 of 1990 Jagir Singh and others vs. The Land Acquisition Collector 23 and another 24 RFA No. 2529 of 1990 Harjinder Singh and others vs. The State of Punjab 25 RFA No. 2436 of 1990 Harbans Singh and another vs. State of Punjab and another 26 RFA No. 1620 of 1990 Tejwant Singh vs. State of Punjab and another 27 RFA No. 122 of 1991 The State of Punjab and Anr. vs. Harnam Singh and another 28 RFA No.123 of 1991 The State of Punjab and Anr vs. Ajit Singh and another 29 RFA No. 124of 1991 The State of Punjab and Anr vs. Kartar Singh 30 RFA No. 125 of 1991 The State of Punjab and Anr vs. Chanan Singh and others 31 RFA No. 126 of 1991 The State of Punjab and Anr vs. Achhar 32 RFA No. 127 of 1991 The State of Punjab and Anr vs. Jaswant Singh and others 33 RFA No. 2554 of 1990 The State of Punjab and Anr vs. Kirpal Singh 34 RFA No. 2555 of 1990 The State of Punjab and Anr vs. Balwant Singh 35 RFA No. 2556 of 1990 The State of Punjab and Anr vs. Piara Singh and another 36 RFA No. 2626 of 1990 The State of Punjab and Anr vs. Dalbir Singh and others 37 RFA No. 2754 of 1990 The State of Punjab and Anr vs. Rachhpal Singh and another 38 RFA No. 2753 of 1990 The State of Punjab and Anr vs. Gurchain Singh RFA No. 2385 of 1990 [3] Sr. Appeal No. Parties Name No. 39 RFA No. 2752 of 1990 The State of Punjab and Anr vs. Hardial Singh and others RFA No. 2751 of 1990 The State of Punjab and Anr vs. Wadhawa Singh through his 40 LRs and others 41 RFA No. 2750 of 1990 The State of Punjab and Anr vs. Amolak Singh and another 42 RFA No. 2749 of 1990 The State of Punjab and Anr vs. Dalbir Singh and others 43 RFA No. 2468 of 1990 The State of Punjab and Anr vs. Harjinder Singh 44 RFA No. 2470 of 1990 The State of Punjab and Anr vs. Harbans Singh 45 RFA No. 2469 of 1990 The State of Punjab and Anr vs. Jagir Singh and others 46 RFA No. 185 of 1991 The State of Punjab and Anr vs. Balwant Singh and another 47 RFA No. 184 of 1991 The State of Punjab and Anr vs. Sunder Singh 48 RFA No. 183 of 1991 The State of Punjab and Anr vs. Naranjan Singh and others 49 RFA No. 182 of 1991 The State of Punjab and Anr vs. Sham Singh and others 50 RFA No. 181 of 1991 The State of Punjab and Anr vs. Balwant Singh 51 RFA No. 180 of 1991 The State of Punjab and Anr vs. Gurdev Singh and others RFA No. 179 of 1991 The State of Punjab and Anr vs. Jagir Singh (dead) through his 52 LRs and others 53 RFA No. 178 of 1991 The State of Punjab and Anr vs. Santokh Singh and others 54 RFA No. 177 of 1991 The State of Punjab and Anr vs. Karam Singh 55 RFA No. 176 of 1991 The State of Punjab and Anr vs. Charan Singh 56 RFA No. 173 of 1991 The State of Punjab and Anr vs. Santokh Singh 57 RFA No. 174 of 1991 The State of Punjab and Anr vs. Balbir Singh 58 RFA No. 175 of 1991 The State of Punjab and Anr vs. Kartar Singh 59 RFA No. 1967 of 1990 The State of Punjab vs. Tejwant Singh The Land Acquisition Collector vide Award dated 10.07.1986 determined the market value of the acquired land in village Ram Nagar at Rs.34480/- per acre for Chahi, Rs.32480/- per acre for Chahi Nehri, Rs.32480/- per acre for Nehri , Rs.26,000/- per acre for Gair Mumkin all kinds and Rs.25,000/- for Barani land.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - H Gupta - Full Document

Criminal Revision No. 12/2008 1 State vs Balwant Singh on 12 March, 2008

In these circumstances I set aside Criminal Revision No. 12/2008 3 State Vs Balwant Singh the impugned order and direct Ld. Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, New Delhi to release the passport on superdari to the revisionist on his furnishing superdarinama in the sum of Rs.50,000/­. Apart from it the revisionist shall also furnish an undertaking by Sh. Randhir Singh the father in law of the revisionist that in case the revisionist does not produce the passport as and when required by the trial court, Sh. Randhir Singh shall deposit Rs.50,000/­ with the trial court and in case he fails to deposit this amount, his land (documents of which would be furnished by Sh. Randhir Singh before Ld. ACMM shall be liable to attach).
Delhi District Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 Next