Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.93 seconds)
Documents citing Nagender Singh vs State Of H.P on 28 February, 2017

Purn Chand vs State Of Hp & Others on 1 October, 2024

44 In view of pronouncements of the Supreme Court in Arvind Kumar Srivastava's case as well as this High Court in CWPOA No.7502 of 2020, titled as Nagender vs State of HP decided on 14.08.2024 and CWPOA No. 7497 of 2020 titled Pritam Singh vs. State of HP decided on 29.07.2024, we are of the considered view that in present matter, petitioner is entitled for all consequential benefits without restriction of 3 years. Therefore, prayer for restricting the arrears is rejected. However, for delay no interest is being granted on arrears at this stage. But for further delay in extending the benefit to the petitioner within time stipulated hereinafter, petitioner shall be entitled for interest also.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 27 - Cited by 0 - V S Thakur - Full Document

State Of Himachal Pradesh vs Sundru Devi on 4 October, 2024

39 In view of pronouncements of the Supreme Court in Arvind Kumar Srivastava's case as well as this High Court in CWPOA No.7502 of 2020, titled as Nagender vs State of HP decided on 14.08.2024 we are of the considered view that in present matter, petitioner is entitled for all consequential benefits without restriction of 3 years. Accordingly, prayer for restricting the arrears is rejected.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 36 - Cited by 0 - V S Thakur - Full Document

Pradeep Kumar vs State Of H.P. & Ors on 18 April, 2024

to challenge in the instant petition for the same reason and the petitioner can also not seek any support from the other judgments relied upon by him, more particularly, judgment rendered in CWP No. 7803/2010, titled as Sukh Dutt vs. State of H.P., decided on 16.12.2010 or for that matter, judgment rendered in CWP (T) No. 15008/2008, titled as Nagender Singh vs. State of H.P., decided on 12.11.2009.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1