Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 22 (0.34 seconds)

Ramesh Chandra Gola vs Mahendra Singhal on 15 December, 2023

3. On the other hand, defendant filed written statement Civ Suit 1197/18 Ramesh Chandra Gola Vs. Mahender Singh 2/10 controverting the claim of the plaintiff stating that the plaintiff had not approached the Court with clean hands. It is stated that the present suit is filed by the plaintiff to extort money from the defendant as the documents present by the plaintiff nowhere mentions the name of the defendant showing that the marbles were ordered by the defendant or the defendant is liable to pay any amount to the plaintiff. It is stated that the defendant had not purchased any marble from the plaintiff. He further denied about the factum of construction at his property bearing no. ED-24, New Ashok Nagar, Delhi-91. It is stated that he had not made any construction in the year 2015. It is stated that the tenants are living in the said property. Other averments of the plaintiff are vehemently denied by the defendant. Prayer is made for the dismissal of the present suit.
Delhi District Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Surinder Kumar Alias Chaudhary ... vs Pawan Kumar on 2 January, 2024

(2) SCC 624] and Michael B Fernandes Vs. CK Jaffer Sharief AIR 2002 SC 1041, of as well as the mandate of the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in case of Ramesh Chand (supra), coupled with the fact that there is no opposition of this application by rt the non-applicants, as such, EMP No.15 of 2023 is allowed and the names of respondents No.2 to 5 are ordered to be deleted from the array of the parties, in this Election Petition. Let amended memo of parties be filed by the applicant-petitioner before the next date of hearing.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next