Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.94 seconds)
Documents citing Icici Lombard General Insurance ... vs Dr.Amit Kumar Thakur & Anr. on 1 April, 2017

United India Insurance Company Limited ... vs Ram Avtar S/O Shri Nihal Singh on 6 April, 2026

cuke jkevorkj vihy la[;k& 112@2024 5 11- vihykFkhZ dh çfrj{kk ;g gS fd ifjoknh ds }kjk Vªd dks vutku txg ij NksM+k x;k vkSj nLrkostkr miyC/k ugha djk, x,A pkch ,oa vkjVhvks dh lwpuk fjiksVZ miyC/k ugha djkbZ xbZA 12- lHkh vk;keksa ij fopkj fd;k x;kA ftyk ifjogu vf/kdkjh /kkSyiqj dk ;g çek.k i= gS fd RJ 11 GA 9062 ij o"kZ 2017&18 ds dj ljpktZ isuYVh dh dqy jkf'k 18]270@& #i, tek gSA o"kZ 2016 rd dk fQVusl çek.k&i= gSA vij eq[; U;kf;d eftLVªsV la[;k 11 vkxjk ds le{k FR is'k gqbZ] tks Lohdkj dh xbZA dkxtkr fnykus gsrq chek daiuh ds }kjk uksfVl fn;k x;kA chek daiuh dks u rks ifjoknh ds }kjk dkxtkr fn, xk;s vkSj u gh chek daiuh us Dyse ds laca/k esa dksbZ fu.kZ; ikfjr fd;kA 13- vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls çLrqr U;kf;d -"Vkar 2018 ¼1½ CPJ B(CN) ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Dr. Amit Kumar Thakur & Anr. esa ;g fl)kar çfrikfnr fd;k x;k fd Qkbusalj ls vns; çek.k&i= is'k ugha fd;k x;k vkSj u gh mls i{kdkj cuk;k x;kA ,xzhesVa ds vuqlkj okgu ij ifjoknh mifufgfr (Bailee) dh fLFkfr j[krk gSA fo}ku ftyk vk;ksx dks i{kdkj cukus gsrq ifjokn okil fd;k x;kA U;kf;d n`"Vkar III (2012) CPJ 4 (SC) - Suryapal Singh Vs. Siddha Vinayak Motors & Anr. esa ;g fl)kar çfrikfnr fd;k x;k fd Hire Purchase Agreement ds vuqlkj fdLrksa dh vnk;xh ugha dh gS] rks Qkbusl a j }kjk okgu dks dCts esa fy;k tk ldrk gS vkSj og Qkbusalj dk fof/kd vf/kdkj gSA 2024 (1) SCC 375 (SC) - Kanwarjit Singh Kang Vs. ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. esa ;g fl)kar çfrikfnr fd;k x;k fd ;fn okgu esa pkch yxh gqbZ NksM+h xbZ gS rks ba';ksjsal Dyse dks [kkfjt fd;k tk ldrk gSA U;kf;d -"Vkar ds ekeys esa FIR 8 fnu nsjh ls ntZ djkbZ xbZ rFkk chek daiuh dks lwpuk 16 fnu ckn nh xbZA gLrxr ekeys esa iqfyl dks lwpuk rRdky ns nh gS] ijarq FIR ntZ ugha dh xbZ] mlds ckn 156¼3½ vkbZ-ih-lh- esa ntZ djkbZ xbZA vr% mä U;kf;d -"Vkar rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa dh fHkUurk ds dkj.k vihykFkhZ dh fdlh çdkj ls enn ugha djrk gSA çFke vihy la[;k 22@2014 & Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Anand Singh ds ekeys esa pksjh fnukad 09@01@2012 dks gqbZA FIR fnukad jkT; miHkksDRkk vk;ksx] lfdZV csp a ] Hkjriqj United India Ins.
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. vs Laxman Singh Kathaith on 16 February, 2023

10. Learned counsel for the appellant cited judgment dated 01.04.2017 passed by Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Raipur in First Appeal No. 657 of 2016; I.C.I.C.I. Lombard General Insurance Company Limited Vs. Dr. Amit Kumar Thakur and another. In the said case, it was specifically pleaded that the complainant had obtained loan from State Bank of India and vehicle was hypothecated with the said bank, therefore, the bank is a necessary party. The said aspect of the matter was considered by the District Commission, which is not the position here. Even otherwise, in the present facts and circumstances of the 6 case, it would not be in the fitness of things to remand the case back to the District Commission with a direction to the complainant to implead the financier as party to the consumer complaint. It is worth mentioning here that the impugned judgment and order passed by the District Commission can not be said to be bad in law, in the absence of specific plea on the part of the insurance company in the written statement submitted before the District Commission.
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1