Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 10, Cited by 0]

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Rashida Ansari vs . Dushyan Kumar Agarwal on 17 November, 2023

Author: Tarlok Singh Chauhan

Bench: Tarlok Singh Chauhan

Rashida Ansari vs. Dushyan Kumar Agarwal C.R No. 164 of 2017 17.11.2023 Present: Ms. Pooja Verma, Proxy Counsel, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ajay Sharma, Proxy Counsel, for the respondent.

Learned proxy counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, states that the settlement is in progress and of the same is likely to be attained within two weeks.

List on 08.12.2023.

rt (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge 17th November, 2023 (Sanjeev) ::: Downloaded on - 17/11/2023 20:33:19 :::CIS Subhash Chand vs. Smt. Aya Devi & Ors.

RSA No. 457 of 2017

17.11.2023 Present: Ms. Pooja Verma, Proxy Counsel, for the appellant.

.

Mr. Ajay Sharma, Proxy Counsel, for respondent No. 1. As jointly prayed for by learned proxy counsel for the parties, list on 01.12.2023.

of (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) rt Judge 17th November, 2023 (Sanjeev) ::: Downloaded on - 17/11/2023 20:33:19 :::CIS Subhash Chand vs. Smt. Aya Devi & Ors.

RSA No. 457 of 2017

17.11.2023 Present: Ms. Pooja Verma, Proxy Counsel, for the appellant.

.

Mr. Ajay Sharma, Proxy Counsel, for respondent No. 1. As jointly prayed for by learned proxy counsel for the parties, list on 01.12.2023.

of (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) rt Judge 17th November, 2023 (Sanjeev) ::: Downloaded on - 17/11/2023 20:33:19 :::CIS The District Collector, Bilaspur vs. Anbar Hussain & Anr.

RSA No. 340 of 2017

17.11.2023 Present: Mr. Y. W. Chauhan, Sr. Addl. A.G. with Ms. Sharmila .

Patial, Addl. A.G., for the appellant.

Mr. Ajay Sharma, Proxy Counsel, for the respondents.

As prayed for by learned proxy counsel for the respondents, list on 15.12.2023.

of (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) rt Judge 17th November, 2023 (Sanjeev) ::: Downloaded on - 17/11/2023 20:33:19 :::CIS Ram Lal & Ors. vs. Veena Devi & Ors.

RSA No. 233 of 2017

17.11.2023 Present: Ms. Pooja Verma, Proxy Counsel, for the appellants.

.

Mr. Ajay Sharma, Proxy Counsel, for the respondents.

As jointly prayed for by learned proxy counsel for the parties, list on 15.12.2023.

of (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge rt 17th November, 2023 (Sanjeev) ::: Downloaded on - 17/11/2023 20:33:19 :::CIS Dina Nath & Anr. vs. Rakesh Kumar RSA No. 173 of 2017 17.11.2023 Present: Ms. Pooja Verma, Proxy Counsel, for the appellants.

.

Mr. Ajay Sharma, Proxy Counsel, for the respondent.

As jointly prayed for by learned proxy counsel for the parties, list on 15.12.2023.

of (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge rt 17th November, 2023 (Sanjeev) ::: Downloaded on - 17/11/2023 20:33:19 :::CIS Daropadi (since deceased) vs. Geeta Devi RSA No. 67 of 2017 17.11.2023 Present: Ms. Pooja Verma, Proxy Counsel, for the appellant.

.

Mr. Ajay Sharma, Proxy Counsel, for respondent No. 1. As jointly prayed for by learned proxy counsel for the appellant, list on 08.12.2023.

of (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) rt Judge 17th November, 2023 (Sanjeev) ::: Downloaded on - 17/11/2023 20:33:19 :::CIS Kuldeep Chand vs. Amarjeet Sharma COPC No. 359 of 2023 17.11.2023 Present: Ms. Pooja Verma, Proxy Counsel, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Y. W. Chauhan, Sr. Addl. A.G. with Ms. Sharmila Patial, Addl. A.G. for the respondent.

Learned Senior Additional Advocate General prays for and is granted two weeks' further time to file reply.

of List on 01.12.2023.

rt (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge 17th November, 2023 (Sanjeev) ::: Downloaded on - 17/11/2023 20:33:19 :::CIS Nirmaljeet Kaur vs. Manju Manik & Ors.

CMPMO No. 140 of 2021

17.11.2023 Present: Ms. Pooja Verma, Proxy Counsel, for the petitioner.

.

Mr. Ajay Sharma, Proxy Counsel, for the respondents.

Dasti notices issued for the service of respondents No. 5(a) and 5(b) have been received back duly served.

of CMP No. 17132 of 2023 List for consideration on 01.12.2023.

rt (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge 17th November, 2023 (Sanjeev) ::: Downloaded on - 17/11/2023 20:33:19 :::CIS Udhey Chand & Ors. vs. Varinder Kumar & ors.

CR No. 68 of 2019

17.11.2023 Present: Ms. Pooja Verma, Proxy Counsel, for the petitioners.

.

Mr. Ajay Sharma, Proxy Counsel, for the respondents.

List for consideration on 24.11.2023.

of (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge 17th November, 2023 (Sanjeev) rt ::: Downloaded on - 17/11/2023 20:33:19 :::CIS Smt. Nirmal Thakur vs. Smt. Suraj Negi & Anr.

RSA No. 515 of 2017

17.11.2023 Present: Ms. Pooja Verma, Proxy Counsel, for the appellant.

.

Mr. Ajay Sharma, Proxy Counsel, for respondent No. 1. Mr. Y. W. Chauhan, Sr. Addl. A.G. with Ms. Sharmila Patial, Addl. A.G., for respondent No. 2.

of As prayed for, list on 01.12.2023.

rt (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge 17th November, 2023 (Sanjeev) ::: Downloaded on - 17/11/2023 20:33:19 :::CIS Thakur Dass Sharma vs. Madan Lal RSA No. 381 of 2017 17.11.2023 Present: Ms. Pooja Verma, Proxy Counsel, for the appellant.

.

Mr. Ajay Sharma, Proxy Counsel, for the respondent.

Learned proxy counsel for the appellant prays for an adjournment on the ground that learned Senior counsel Mr. of Ajay Kumar is out of station in connection with the treatment of his ailing wife.

As prayed for, list on 15.12.2023. rt (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge 17th November, 2023 (Sanjeev) ::: Downloaded on - 17/11/2023 20:33:19 :::CIS Sh. Vinod Kumar Thakur vs. Sh. Rattan Singh & Ors.

RSA No. 332 of 2019

17.11.2023 Present: Ms. Pooja Verma, Proxy Counsel, for the appellant.

.

Mr. Ajay Sharma, Proxy Counsel, for the respondents.

CMP Nos. 6733/2019 & 6055/2021 List these applications for consideration on of 24.11.2023.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) rt Judge 17th November, 2023 (Sanjeev) ::: Downloaded on - 17/11/2023 20:33:19 :::CIS Viliam Singh & Ors. vs. Abhishek Jain & Ors.

COPC No. 240 of 2023

17.11.2023 Present: Ms. Pooja Verma, Proxy Counsel, for the petitioners.

.

Mr. Y. W. Chauhan, Sr. Addl. A.G. with Ms. Sharmila Patial, Addl. A.G., for the respondents.

CMP No. 12258 of 2023

Reply is stated to have been filed, however, the of same is not on record. Registry is directed to trace and place the same on record.

rt List on 24.11.2023.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge 17th November, 2023 (Sanjeev) ::: Downloaded on - 17/11/2023 20:33:19 :::CIS UCO Bank vs. Rajesh Thakur CMPMO No. 629 of 2023 17.11.2023 Present: Mr. Sanjay Dalmia, Advocate, for the petitioner.

.

CMPMO No. 629/2023 & CMP No. 16661/2023 Issue dasti notice for the service of respondent, returnable for 01.12.2023, on taking the steps during the of course of the day.

In the meanwhile, further proceedings in Civil Suit No. 900130/2010, titled as Rajesh Thakur vs. UCO rt Bank, pending before the learned Senior Civil Judge, Shimla, are ordered to be stayed.

Copy dasti.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge 17th November, 2023 (Sanjeev) ::: Downloaded on - 17/11/2023 20:33:19 :::CIS Narender Singh Thakur vs. Smt. Sukhwanti & Ors.

CMP(M) No. 846 of 2017

17.11.2023 Present: Ms. Pooja Verma, Proxy Counsel, for the applicant.

.

Mr. Ajay Sharma, Proxy Counsel, for the respondents.

List for consideration on 24.11.2023.

of (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge 17th November, 2023 (Sanjeev) rt ::: Downloaded on - 17/11/2023 20:33:19 :::CIS Yub Raj vs. Shankar Dutt RSA NO. 406 of 2017 17.11.2023 Present: Ms. Pooja Verma, Proxy Counsel, for the appellant.

.

Mr. Ajay Sharma, Proxy Counsel, for respondents No. 1(b) to 1(d).

CMP(M) No. 1298 of 2022

Reply not filed. The applicant has filed this of application for bringing on record the LRs of the sole respondent. Even though the application has been filed rt belatedly and is barred by 70 days, I find that sufficient cause has been carved out by the applicant, which prevented him from filing the application within the prescribed period of limitation. Accordingly, the delay in filing of the application is condoned and the LRs of the sole respondent, as mentioned in para - 1 of the application, are ordered to be brought on record. Application stands disposed of.

RSA No. 406 of 2017

Since, the newly added respondents are duly represented, therefore, there is no requirement of issuing fresh notice in the main appeal.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge 17th November, 2023 (Sanjeev) ::: Downloaded on - 17/11/2023 20:33:19 :::CIS