Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.80 seconds)

Dharmendra Gupta vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 20 January, 2023

It is also contended by the counsel for State that the petitioners are still absconding and therefore, any direction at this stage, will have bearing on the investigation which is being carried out by the prosecution. It is further contended by the counsel that the petitioners arrest is also necessary for a just and proper investigation and thus, while placing reliance on the decision of this Court in WP No.7744/2022 (Dr. Anand Rai Vs. State of M.P.) submits that no interference is required.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - M S Bhatti - Full Document

Vijeta Singh Lodhi vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 8 February, 2023

It is also contended by the counsel for State that the petitioner husband is still absconding and therefore, any direction at this stage, will have bearing on the investigation which is being carried out by the prosecution. It is further contended by the counsel that the petitioner arrest is also necessary for a just and proper investigation and thus, while placing reliance on the decision of this Court in WP No.7744/2022 (Dr. Anand Rai Vs. State of M.P.) submits that no interference is required.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - M S Bhatti - Full Document
1   2 Next