Rahman Khan vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 23 August, 2024
16. The case of Ms. Swagatika Impex Pvt. Ltd. (supra) does not
help the counsel for respondent No.2 because the facts of that case are
altogether different from the case in hand. There was no question of
suppression of material fact because the cause of action arose in favour
of the petitioners only when the order dated 06.01.2016 (Annexure-P/6)
was passed by the authority regularizing them in pursuance of their
contract appointment, but not granting them the benefit of regularization
from the date of completion of two years of service whereas some of the
private respondents were granted the said benefit after completion of
two years service and as such, asking the benefit of policy dated
29.11.1996 (Annexure-P/1) on the ground of discrimination, the instant
10
W.P. No.2013 of 2017
petition has been filed. However, in the case on which the counsel for
respondent No.2 has placed reliance, the Supreme Court has observed as
under:-