Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 28 (0.61 seconds)

Mahesh Chand Bhargava Died Thr. Lrs Smt. ... vs Shri Ramesh Chand Bhargava on 20 December, 2021

brother of the petitioner filed an appeal on 10.03.2015 against the order dated 31.10.1975 passed by the Naib Tahsildar along with an application filed under Section 5 of the Indian Limitation Act. The only ground which was raised by the respondent was that from the year 1962 onwards the appellant/respondent herein had left his village Gohinda and shifted to the house of his maternal uncle Permanand Patel for prosecuting his studies. After completing his studies, he started practicing as a Lawyer and at present, he is residing in Gwalior. Till the year 2014, the appellant/respondent herein was jointly cultivating the land and therefore, he did not get any suspicion about the misdeeds done by the petitioner and, accordingly, he never verified from the revenue records. On 05.08.2014 the petitioner started claiming that he is the owner of the 3 THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH WP-26818-2021 Mahesh Chand Bhargava died through LRs Smt. Manko Devi Vs. Shri Ramesh Chand Bhargava entire land and when the respondent herein was denied his claim then he was informed that the land which had fallen to the share of Moolchandra has already been mutated in the name of the petitioner. Accordingly, the appeal was filed. The application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act was opposed by the petitioner by filing the written reply. The SDO by order dated 06.05.2017 not only allowed the application filed under Section 5 of the Indian Limitation Act and condoned the delay in filing the appeal, but also allowed the appeal on the ground that the petitioner had failed to prove that he was adopted by Moolchandra.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 1 - G S Ahluwalia - Full Document

Pyare Lal Jatav vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 19 April, 2022

Considering the submission and innocuous prayer made by the petitioner for consideration to his representation, without commenting 3 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH W.P.No. 26175/2021 ( Pyare Lal Jatav Vs. The State of M.P. & Others) upon the submissions so advanced, the petitioner is set at liberty to approach respondents/concerned authorities seeking audience on the aforesaid plea of parity alongwith relevant documents. Respondents/concerned shall consider the representation and other documents, if not already decided, and shall take a decision themselves or forward the same to the competent authority for decision thereupon.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - A Pathak - Full Document
1   2 3 Next