State of Rajasthan - Act
Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commission (Investment Approval) Regulations, 2006
RAJASTHAN
India
India
Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commission (Investment Approval) Regulations, 2006
Rule RAJASTHAN-ELECTRICITY-REGULATORY-COMMISSION-INVESTMENT-APPROVAL-REGULATIONS-2006 of 2006
- Published on 18 July 2006
- Commenced on 18 July 2006
- [This is the version of this document from 18 July 2006.]
- [Note: The original publication document is not available and this content could not be verified.]
Part I – Preliminary
1. Short title, commencement and applicability.
2. Definitions.
- In these regulations, unless the context otherwise requires,3. Appraisal of scheme.
4. Annual Investment Plan.
| (a) | Distribution scheme | 1 year |
| (b) | Transmission scheme | 2 years |
| (c) | Generation scheme | 3 years. |
5. Implementation and progress report.
1. Generation Schemes. - 1.1. The projects for capacity additions of conventional generation shall be formulated based on the net long term (i.e. at least next 5 years), requirement i.e. gap between demand of energy and availability projections by distribution licensees/Vitran Nigams after accounting for the following:-
(a)Non-conventional energy generation capacity available in the State or its percentage share specified by the Commission, whichever is less.(b)Capacity Share in generation capacity of projects through competitive bidding.(c)Available generation capacity from intra state and inter state conventional generation projects.2. Transmission Scheme. - Transmission Schemes of 132 KV and higher voltage shall be identified by predominance of one or more of the following factors and shall be selected for implementation in the order of preference as under:-
3. Sub transmission and distribution Schemes. - Sub transmission and distribution schemes shall be identified by pre-dominance of one or more of the following, factors and selected for implementation as under:-
4. Capacitor Installation Schemes. - (1) In respect of transmission licensee, these scheme shall include capacitor banks to be provided to maintain grid parameters within permissible limits and kVARh flow within the limit prescribed by RERC for this purpose, based on the requirement as indicated by NREB on the basis of system study conducted by them and taking into consideration the additional generating capacity envisaged in the State. Additional system studies shall be conducted by STU to work out the capacitors banks to be provided by RVPN, distribution licensee and RVUN/other generators.
5. Metering Schemes (transmission). - (1) Metering scheme of transmission licensee shall conform to Metering Code for Rajasthan Grid incorporated in part - III of Grid Code and shall consists of the following:-
(a)Metering with high degree of accuracy to have commercial settlement between (i) RVPN and Vitaran Nigams, and (ii) RVPN and RVUN. There may be check metering to have assessment about the correctness of interface metering.(b)For assessing the loadings and losses of RVPN's lines and sub-stations.Remote meter reading facility may be provided to reduce meter reading time and to effect cross checks etc. at SLDC.6. Load Dispatch and Communication Schemes shall consist of the following. - (a) Counter part works of ULDC schemes of NRLDS for the State.
7. Institutional Strengthening Scheme. - This will include technical advisory services, consultancy services to meet institutional strengthening, including efficiency improvement in licensee's business operation & training to the personnel.
8. Consumer service.
9. Preliminary works. - shall include survey and investigations and land acquisition for new works. These shall be adjusted against the cost of scheme as soon as the same starts getting implemented.
B. Examination and Selection:| Category | Ceiling limit of outlay | |
| 1 | Continuing works after COD and carried overliability | 15% |
| 2 | New Generation scheme | 90% |
| 3 | Dedicated transmission system | 20% |
| 4 | Project preparation and preliminary worksincluding Survey and investigation, statutory clearances andconsultancy | 5% |
| 5 | Institutional strengthening | 2% |
| Category | Ceiling limit of outlay | |
| 1 | ongoing schemes and carried over liability | 10% |
| 2 | Schemes for power evacuation, defense/strategicimportance and water supply | 60% |
| 3 | Other Schemes based on cost benefit analysis | 60% |
| 4 | Capacitor installation, load prelimin islandingopen access and metering. | 5% |
| 5 | Project preparation and Preliminary worksincluding Survey and investigation, statutory clearances andconsultancy | 3% |
| 6 | Institutional strengthening | 2% |
| Category | Ceiling limit of outlay | |
| 1 | Ongoing schemes and carried over liability | 5% |
| 2 | (a) Schemes for powerevacuation(b) Schemes for defence/strategic importance andwater supply | 5%5% |
| 3 | Rural electrification : | 12.5% |
| 4 | Other schemes basedon cost benefit analysis(a) Reduction ofsystem losses :(b) Systemstrengthening :(c) SystemAugmentation :(d) System Improvement : | 12.5%12.5%12.5%12.5% |
| 5 | (a) Capacitorinstallation(b) Load dispatch &Metering :(c) Consumerservicing :(d) Institutional strengthening. | 7.5%7.5%5%1% |
| 6 | Project preparation and preliminary worksincluding Survey and investigation, statutory clearances andconsultancy | 3% |
| 7 | Supply to Consumers | 10% |
1. Criteria of Selection of EHV Schemes. - 1.1 As entire EIIV transmission system of the State is operated in an integrated manner with EHV transmission system of Northern Region,. EIIV scheme shall meet connectivity criteria of C.T.U. Accordingly, the performance of (including load flows) on such integrated transmission system (including additions & augmentations) having multiple loops/grid formation shall be determined annually through load flow and other studies using digital computers. Such studies shall be conducted for the existing generating stations transmission system as well as new generating stations, transmission system as envisaged in the next five years by CTU and STU. In conducting such studies, Generating stations, transmission lines and sub-station envisaged in National Electricity Plan, notified by Central Electricity Authority as per Section 3(4) of the Electricity Act 2005, shall be considered. Load flow and other studies conducted by the Central Electricity Authority or Central Transmission Utiling or National/or/them Regional Load Dispatch center or any other organization, shall form the base, on which the existing and envisaged state transmission system (not considered therein) shall be superimposed by STU in their studies. Such studies shall be conducted by State transmission utility for the existing system and system as envisaged in the next 5 years to develop transmission system satisfying Grid code and planning and design criterion of these guidelines. Based on such studies, the optimal intra-state transmission system shall be developed with the adequacy of transmission system tested for: peak load during summer, winter and monsoon and off-peak loads during these seasons for.
| Conductor Type and Dimension | Ambient Temperature°c | Thermal Loading At 75°c ConductorTemperature |
| Acsr Panther Conductor 210 Sq.Mm | 50 | 300 Amps. (71 Mva At 132 Kv) |
| Acsr Zebra Conductor 120 Sq. Mm | 50 | 750 Amps (173 Mva At 132 Kv) |
| Acsr Moose 520 Sq. Mm | 40 | 837 Amps (388 Mva At 132 Kv) |
| Line Voltage | Surge Impedance Loading |
| 132 kV | 46 MW. |
| 220 kV | 129 MW. |
| 400 kV with 50% reactive compensation. | 410 MW. |
| 400 kV without reactive compensation. | 533 MW |
2. Criteria of Selection of Distribution Schemes. - 2.1 As sub transmission and distribution system of the Vitran Nigam is operated in an integrated manner with transmission system of RVPN and also of Northern reg ion, it must meet the connectivity criteria of STU & CTU.
| Conductor | Constant for 11 KV line | Constant for 33 KV Line |
| Squirrel | 0.9925 | - |
| Weasel | 0.8525 | 0.09575 |
| Farret | 0.6756 | 0.07619 |
| Rabbit | 0.5881 | 0.0665 |
| Mink | 0.5006 | 0.05681 |
| Dog | 0.4303 | 0.04922 |
| Raccoon | 0.3613 | 0.04131 |
| Leopard | - | 0.03381 |
| Wolf | - | 0.03222 |
| Panther | - | 0.03063 |
3. General Criteria For Capacity Augmentation of Transformers on EHV Grid Sub-stations. - The General Criterion for capacity augmentation of transformers on EHV Grid Sub-station shall be as under: -
4. General design criteria for strengthening of transmission system:
5. Shunt reactor compensation
(5.1) 400 kV shunt reactor are 50, 63 and 75.MV Ar.Shut capacitive compensation may vary-from 40-50% of line capacitance. Shunt reactor may not be provided where either compensation as above requires shunt compensation less than 50 MVA or due to series capacitor compensation voltage rise due to ferranti effect is less than 5%.6. Transformation Capacity
| Normal Voltage | Capacity (MVA) proposed by CEA |
| 400 kV | 1000 |
| 220 kV | 400 |
| 132 kV | 150 |
4. Shunt Capacitor Compensation at Sub-Station. - (1) For developing an optimal power system, the power factor of the load of distribution licensee at 220 kV and 132 kV voltage level shall be above 0.85. However, for 132 KV sub-stations feeding to predominantly agricultural load, power factor, if below 0.7, shall be improved by distribution licensee to 0.85 during peak agricultural demand by 31.3.2007 or within 2 years of the commissioning of the sub-station, whichever is later.
5. Protection schemes (distribution system). - Priority of providing protection for electric line as per metering and protection code shall be in descending order of system voltage and for sub-station shall be in descending order of system voltage and transformation capacity.
Form-1-A.....................................Vitran/Utpadan/Prasaran Nigam Limited| Investment proposals for the financialyear............................ | |||||||||||
| Write up on investment proposal (includingjustification of high capital cost, capital additions and costover runs) |
| Generation | Variable Charges (In Rs./ KWh) | Capacity Charges (in Rs./ Kwh) | ||
| Transmission | Charge per KW per Month (in Rs.) | |||
| Distribution | Consumer Service/KWh | Net Work Charges/ KWh. | Energy Cost/Kwh | |
| S. No. | Particular of work | Total cost of scheme/works (Rs. in Lakhs) | Year of start of scheme | Date/Year of Commissioning | Cost-Benefit Ratio in $(%) by Net presentValue Method | |
| At the end of 5 Years | 10 Years | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| A. | Approved schemes @1. Ongoing2. New3. Carried overliability of closed schemes4. Total | |||||
| B. | Other works(excluding deposit works)1. Ongoing2. New3. Carried overliability of closed schemes4. Total | |||||
| C. | Deposit Works1. ongoing2. New3. Total |
| Physical targets | Expenditure 1 incurred (its, in Lakhs) | Remarks | |||||
| Unit | For Prev. year | During current year | Upto the Prev. Year | During Prev. Year | During current year | Proposed to be incurrent in nextyear(s) | |
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
2. @ details will be shown for each scheme, prepared by Nigam and submitted to Commission/Financial Institution/Governments for approval.
3. Specify appropriate unit e.t. KW, KVA, KVAR, KVARh, Nr., Km.
4. $ Specify LCA (lest cost alternative VNA where cost benefit ratio in inapplicable.
Form 3....................................VitranAJtpadan/Prasaran Nigam LimitedInvestment proposals for the financial year.(Sources of funding)| S. No. | Particulars of work | Total cost of Scheme/ Works (Rs. In Lacs) | Sources of cost to be funded by (Rs. in Lakhs) | Sources of cost to be funded by in Currentyear (Rs. In lakhs) | ||||||||
| Equity | Debt | Consumer contribution | Grants/Subsidy | Total | Equity | Debt | Consumers contribution | Grants/Subsidy | Total | |||
| A. | Approved Schemes1 Ongoing 2. New3. Carried overliability of closed/Complete Schemes4.Total | |||||||||||
| B. | Others works(Excluding Deposit Works)1. Ongoing 2. New3. Carried overliability of closed/Complete Schemes4.Total | |||||||||||
| C. | Deposit/Works1. Ongoing 2. New3. Total |
| Sources of cost to be funded during previousyear (Rs. in Lakhs) | Sources of cost to be funded upto PreviousYear (Rs. in Lakhs) | Re- marks | ||||||||
| Equity | Debt | consumers contribution | Grants/Subsidy | Total | Equity | Debt | Consumers contribution | Grants/Subsidy | Total | |
| S.No. | Particulars | Upto Previous year (Rs. In Lakhs) | During Previous year (Rs. In Lakhs) | Proposed for Current Year (Rs. In Lakhs) | |||||||||
| Equiry | Debt | Grants/Subsidies/Consumers Contributions | Total | Equiry | Debt | Grants/Subsidies/Consumers Contributions | Total | Equiry | Debt | Grants/Subsidies/Consumers Contributions | Total | ||
| A. | Particulars/Sources of Funding (Us. in Lakhs) | ||||||||||||
| 1 | Generation schemes/works | ||||||||||||
| 2 | Power evacuation schemes/works | ||||||||||||
| 3 | Loss reduction schemes/work | ||||||||||||
| 4 | System improvement/stability/reliabilityschemes/works | ||||||||||||
| 5 | Rural electrification schemes/works | ||||||||||||
| 7 | Works/schemes related to supply to consumers | ||||||||||||
| 8 | Load dispatch/SCADA/Communica tion schemes/works | ||||||||||||
| 9 | Metering schemes | ||||||||||||
| 10 | Reactive compensation schemes/works | ||||||||||||
| 11 | Institutional Strenghtening | ||||||||||||
| 12 | Project preparation and Preliminary works |
| B. | Physical targets | Upto previous year | During Previous Year | Proposed for Current Year | |||
| 1 | Generation Capacity | MW | MW | MW | |||
| 2 | Transmission/ Distribution Lines | ckt.Kms | Av.cost/km | ckt.Kms | Av.cost/ Km | ckt.Kms | Av.cost/ Km |
| (a) 400 KV lines | |||||||
| (b) 220 KV lines | |||||||
| (c) 132 KV lines | |||||||
| (d) 33 KV linos | |||||||
| (e) 11 KV lines | |||||||
| (f) LT lines | |||||||
| (g) Other lines @ |
| C. | Sub- stations | Upto Previous Year | During Previous Year | Proposed for Current Year | ||||||
| Num- bers | Tranforma-tion Capacity (in KVA) | Num- bers | Transfro-mer Capacity (In KVA) | Num- bers | Transormer Capacity (In KVA) | |||||
| New | Augmentation | New | Augmentation | New | Augmentation | |||||
| 1 | (a) 400 KV | |||||||||
| 2 | (b) 220 KV | |||||||||
| 3 | (c) 132 KV | |||||||||
| 4 | (d) 33 KV | |||||||||
| 5 | (e) 11 KV |
| D. | Reactive Compensation | KVAr. | Av. Cost/ kVAr. | KVAr. | Av.Cost/ kVAr. | KVAr. | Av.Cost/ kVAr. |
| 1 | Shunt Reactor | ||||||
| (a) at 400 KV s/s | |||||||
| (b) at 220 KV s/s | |||||||
| (c) at Other KV s/s | |||||||
| 2 | Shunt Capacitors | ||||||
| (a) at 400 KV s/s | |||||||
| (b) at 220 KV s/s | |||||||
| (c) at 132 KV s/s | |||||||
| (d) at 33 KV s/s | |||||||
| (e) at 11 KV s/s | |||||||
| (f) at LT | |||||||
| 3 | Series Capacitors (Specify details) | ||||||
| 4 | Dynamic Compensation (Specify details) |
| Upto Previouss year | For Current Year | For Previous year | |||||
| E. | Meters | Number | Av. Cost/ Meter | Number | Av. Cost/ Meter | Number | Av. Cost/ Meter |
| 1 | ABT complaint | ||||||
| 2 | HT meters | ||||||
| 3 | 3 phase trivector | ||||||
| 4 | 3 phase LT | ||||||
| 5 | I Phase LT |
| F. | Release of Service connections (tariffcategory wise) | For Current Year | For Previous year | ||||
| No. of connections | Total Expenditure | Av. Cost/ Connection | No. of connections | Total Expenditure | A. Cost/ Connection | ||